nope. the haters would just compain that its just another gimmicky peripheralogvampire

it would work pretty well with games if they really tried

This would attract me to wii as much as i hate the wii right now if nintendo actually created a game using something like this. This is sick man!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw

They should do something like that more than stupid things like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgRriCJARvU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgRriCJARvU

This looks so sweet, i cant wait for it. I just love the music that is being played just by wii music. Isnt it great :D :lol:

AAAAVVUVUAVUVUVAAVUVAAVUVAAAA.......aaaaVUVAAAVUUVAAAVUVAAAAvuAAAA..a..a..aaaaVUVaAAVUUVAAAAVUVAAA

Thats a sick beat.

[QUOTE="DirtyHorse"]

mario galaxy scored excellent too but i still didnt buy it. i have a ps3 and like it more than wii and i didnt get uncharted on it (if that makes you happy), scores arent based on their worthiness. I rent these games if i have interest in them. 'll admit that zack and wiki is "decent and not bad" but just not worth MY $40.

air_wolf_cubed

Just to let you know that i am not a fakeboy and to let you know that there are games that i also think that arent worth $40-$60 on my second favorte platform. There some games like these on my first(PC) favorite platform too.

[QUOTE="DirtyHorse"]

[QUOTE="BuryMe"][QUOTE="DirtyHorse"]w.e you say, i didnt even read that middle paragraph bout online. But guess what? still NO ONLINE! :lol: and its still a rip-off for $40, i'd buy it around $25 air_wolf_cubed

So COD4 doesnt need online to be great? I am saying that these days, this generation, games are mostly appreciated by their online.Games without online are mostly rented. They dont have much replayability. And i noe i wouldnt spent $50 on a game that i know i wont be playing after i beat it like this game because i am not aan idiot, i care how i spe my money. i hav other things that i need to take care of rather than just spenting most of my money on these kind of games.

If you had a look at my games, then you wouldnt find a single game that doesnt have "good" online multiplayer or excellent offline multiplayer (like a fighting game). What does zack and wiki have that would make me buy the game?

If i wanted a game similar to zack and wiki, then i definitly wouldnt get this game since theres alot better than it out there on the other consoles i own (PS3 nd PC).

For example: BFBC, the single is crap but guess what saved it from flopping?

mario galaxy scored excellent too but i still didnt buy it. i have a ps3 and like it more than wii and i didnt get uncharted on it (if that makes you happy), scores arent based on their worthiness. I rent these games if i have interest in them. 'll admit that zack and wiki is "decent and not bad" but just not worth MY $40.

[QUOTE="DirtyHorse"]w.e you say, i didnt even read that middle paragraph bout online. But guess what? still NO ONLINE! :lol: and its still a rip-off for $40, i'd buy it around $25 BuryMe

So COD4 doesnt need online to be great? I am saying that these days, this generation, games are mostly appreciated by their online.Games without online are mostly rented. They dont have much replayability. And i noe i wouldnt spent $50 on a game that i know i wont be playing after i beat it like this game because i am not aan idiot, i care how i spe my money. i hav other things that i need to take care of rather than just spenting most of my money on these kind of games.

If you had a look at my games, then you wouldnt find a single game that doesnt have "good" online multiplayer or excellent offline multiplayer (like a fighting game). What does zack and wiki have that would make me buy the game?

If i wanted a game similar to zack and wiki, then i definitly wouldnt get this game since theres alot better than it out there on the other consoles i own (PS3 nd PC).

For example: BFBC, the single is crap but guess what saved it from flopping?

[QUOTE="DirtyHorse"][QUOTE="flazzle"][QUOTE="DirtyHorse"][QUOTE="flazzle"]

So Zack and Wiki is garbage? What didn't you like about it?

Hexagon_777

no replayability, no online, grafix but the biggest factor is rally no replayability for a game that is $50.NO!

Well, the graphics are considered good by most. I can't find a review that says they are bad. Even GS thinks so

"Sharp graphics with excellent art style"

And actually, there are quite a few different ways to solve many puzzles. So there is some replayability right there.

No online? Do you even know ANYTHING about this game, because it sounds like you really don't know what this game is or what you are talking about. It's an ADVENTURE game. Not an RPG game. What would you have? To connect with someone to help you both move the same character? Or have them use the 2nd or 3rd multiplayer option to click on items and help search for stuff? Online makes ZERO sense if you actually knew anything about the game.

And who is charging you $50? The game was released at 39.99.

Complain about a game you actually know something about next time.

w.e you say, i didnt even read that middle paragraph bout online. But guess what? still NO ONLINE! :lol: and its still a rip-off for $40, i'd buy it around $25

Stop being a sore loser and just accept that you know jack about the game, okay? :|

and how did he own me again?

as a cow myself im tellin u to just give it upstereointegrity

then you are not a cow, i can guarentee you.

[QUOTE="DirtyHorse"]

w.e you say, i didnt even read that middle paragraph bout online. But guess what? still NO ONLINE! :lol: and its still a rip-off for $40, i'd buy it around $25

flazzle

Why SHOULD it have online? how would it fit into the game? can you explain?

All you are proving is that you make statements about things you know nothing about. Maybe you don't know what ONLINE is?

why shouldnt it have online? iand any game can fit tp have online. and how can i not know what online is, i am not a sheep :lol: