[QUOTE="Rickylee"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Yeah it seems to be that way. Everything that EA touches turns to a rushed game. Surely the developers can put their foot down and say enough is enough though???FelipeInside

Does EA expect these lossing results? Or are they insane and keep doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

Wasdie, why do these game makers such as Bioware use EA if this is known? Is it the convenience of it being easy or do they too just not care for anything but the bottom line? And if that is all they care about, you would think if that is dwindling, there would be a change...

It's all about the $$. It's always been about the money. They are making a crap ton of money and they are going to keep making money. If you had a small business and someone came and offered you 20-40 million, i'm pretty sure you would say yes.

It's not that the ending sucks, it's that, compared to the rest of the series, it sucks. Seems like right around after ME 2 I started seeing a trend of companies recycling maps to increase play time? Dragon Age 2 was the worst. You had a whole bunch of quests, but you basically ran around the same maps over and over. I felt jipped. I noticed the same thing in ME 3. The game, Rage did it somewhat, and a host of others I've played recently. Kind of sad when companies just want to pump out more games, less quality, more child friendly, more money and hope the hardcore fans who really care and and support the companies don't notice. So in ME 3, you get the same ending for all 3 choices with different eyes lol. Really? Recycled? Sure, companies have to make money, but they also have to know when to balance qauntity vs quality.