Elfranger007's forum posts

  • 19 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for Elfranger007
Elfranger007

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Elfranger007
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Future predictions: MGS4 - 6.5 Gran Turismo 5- 7.2 Final Fantasy XIII - 5.8 (all because they are really good games that didnt meet the requirement$)

kljohns2

Heh I can actually see those scores coming. MGS4 will be too much of the old stuff and so 7. Gran Turismo, dang its too realistic so 6.5 FF13, shoot thats too long so again 7. Killzone 2, whoops actually is running in true high def so 5.5.

Avatar image for Elfranger007
Elfranger007

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Elfranger007
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
I actually went to sleep and woke up with a clear mind and tried to go through his review again to see maybe time will make it better. The sad thing is that it is still a bad review. I read other people's review and I agree what they are saying. The PS3 did get low balled from all directions. It got low balled when Gamespot gave it to a person who doesn't review these games. It got low balled again when the reviewer decided to bash the game because he can't comprehend the enjoyment of the series. I don't know who is at fault more, the close minded reviewer or gamespot itself for givign it to that reviewer. Etiher way I feel there was some bias.
Avatar image for Elfranger007
Elfranger007

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Elfranger007
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="Vojkan80001"]Guy is a clown. To give this game 7.5 is ludicrous. So Eye of the Judgment and Beautiful Katamari are better games? Ace Combat 6 (average crap) got 8.5 and this 7.5? Since Greg Kasavin left reviews suck big time on this site, while he was here this site was THE SITE to check reviews.gamingqueen

Don't insult people cause of games! He was absolutly right about Heavenly Sword review! It's he's opinion. If you like the game go and buy it! As simple as this.

I think the problem is that PS3 games have been getting short end of the stick for so long now that when an execellent game (ask 95% of reviewers out there) comes out they still do it, it just pisses us off. Whats the worst is that they don't even do it in a good manner. Other sites which gave it below 90 (2 of them) actually did a very good review who actually told what they loved and what could be done better. Here they give it to a dumbass who just decided to blast it. There is no way in the world this game is a 7.5 unless you have some bias or you are too stupid to enjoy the game. Ahh IGN and gametrailers it seems like you are one of the few good ones remaining.

Avatar image for Elfranger007
Elfranger007

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Elfranger007
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="BZSIN"]

Why, because he worked on some PlayStation thing? That proves absolutely nothing.

Skylock00

Some playstation thing? There's a difference betwee 'working on some Playstation thing,' and being the /head/ of a Playstation-focused independent review site.

I don't really see how someone could be biased against the platform in the way that you claim given that he worked at such a site long enough to become the Editor in Chief.

I think that Aaron might just a very, very critical person when it comes to some aspects of a game's design than others, possibly. He gave Shadow of the Colossus a lower score than most when he was part of PSXextreme, IIRC, being more critical of the game's shortcomings than other. Perhaps the review's lower than others in this case not because of a bias against the game, but Aaron merely being more critical about the game than others.

*shrugs* I'm not sure, hence why I'm not saying anything for certain here.

See thats the problem I have with his review. It was so unprofessional. Being critical is one thing , blasting it is another. Other reviewers have given multiple pages detailing what they liked about it and what could be done better. This guy on the other hand gets into his one page review looking to find the problems and keeps coming back to them. I am not sure whether he doesn't know how to review a platformer game or was he stoned through it, but clearly it sucks. I

don't understand why this big game can't get Gerstman, Kassavin, etc type reviewers. Whatever. Its just not a small number of people that believe this so there is definetly a consensus that this reviewer just sucked. I think even at some level you guys know that the score is too low but refuse to acknowledge it.

Avatar image for Elfranger007
Elfranger007

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Elfranger007
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
If you really want the BC go for the 80 then. Its an extra hundred bucks but in reality only 40 more since motorstorm comes with it. Just a different way of looking at it.
Avatar image for Elfranger007
Elfranger007

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Elfranger007
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Hey MODS, if we dont complain to u then who do we complain to?? And wat do u guys have to say about the MOD who goes by the name of JUSTPLAINLUCAS, he said that the ps3 will be the hardest to impress gamestop and the sooner people realize it the better. Now that sounds like a biased comment. It shows something about gamespot and its workers.AgentZero225

Well it certainly looks like they are keeping with their word. I am actually thinking Uncharted will not get above an 8 here. Probably will come with some bs excuses then also.

Avatar image for Elfranger007
Elfranger007

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Elfranger007
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
EmperorSupreme

How convenient that you leave out 1up which gave the game an 8.5 and game spy which gave it four stars...which some how equals 80%

Also Gamepro gave 100%, should be in your list. Make it grow I say.

I didn't post those numbers, but both those are still higher than the GS score. Your confusing me, what was your point.

Avatar image for Elfranger007
Elfranger007

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Elfranger007
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Lets see how bias Gamespot is truly by comparing the review score with other sites. All review are based on today's date 10/24/2007.

GameSpot say 7.5 out of 10

IGN say 9.4 out of 10

PSM Magazine say 9.5 out of 10

Pro-G say 9 out of 10

GameZone say 9.3 out of 10

Gaming Age say A-

PSX Extreme say 9 out of 10

UnderGroundOnline say A-

Gametrailers say 9 out of 10

GamerNode say 9.5 out of 10

According to every site I have pointed out, it has a score of Halo 3. Are GameSpot gone mad? They really lost my reputation and thousands of PS3 fans.

Here is the link, see it for your self:

http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/932369.asp?q=ratchet%20%20clank

siversalih200

Don't forget Game Informer, one of the most reputable magazines: 9.25/10.

  • 19 results
  • 1
  • 2