m still not impressed by KZ2 graphics, the only thing from KZ2 that impressed me was the first CG trailer. Don't get me wrong the graphics look nice and atmospheric but imo this game will have no chance against Uncharted 2 graphics, i really dislike games with such a boring colour pallet, every level looks like it has just one colour and i prefer more natural environments, so far KZ2 has only cities and industrial stuff, most what you see are just walls i really hate this. skyformLower your expectations, dude...If you think Killzone 2 doesn't look impressive..than NO console game looks impressive. Your probably the ONLY non fanboy who doesn't think it looks good,or are you another hater in disquise? most likely.
Eyezonmii's forum posts
you serious? wow...Gear, IMO is a much more intense and competitive online experience...bigger learning curve, tho. I definetaly don't agree with you. I think the exact opposite, and the fact that Gears 2 mp is broken makes it even worse (im thinking about host-advantage, glitching, shotgun and boomer glitch etc.)[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="speedsix"]Gears doesn't translate well into competetive multiplayer imo. Horde mode is superb though.Cyberfairy
Halo 3 also have alot more customization.
to each there own, i think the whole "Gears flaws" is being overused..it still playable...what about gears 1 then? Gears requires more skill, Halo 3 doesn't. but i respect your opinion.Gears doesn't translate well into competetive multiplayer imo. Horde mode is superb though.speedsixyou serious? wow...Gear, IMO is a much more intense and competitive online experience...bigger learning curve, tho.
Horde mode is incredible. It's all I play. I wish that they would make it go up higher levels though. With stronger and different types of monsters.BumFluff122done all 50 waves by your self?
Has for me, going back to Halo 3 feel so plain and boring, part of what makes gears insanly fun and intense is the pop shots, gore, cover and the abilitie to use more than just melees to finsih off your enemies.
Halo 3 is nothing but melee shoot, grenade kill, melee shoot grenade and kill. It feels as if the game doesn't require skill and autoaim doesn't help.
IMO, bungie needs evolve the gameplay because its aged...add more gameplay options and further the experience. I think halo 3 should of had some destrucatability and more gameplay additions. Bungie have great talent for story, i will give them that...but hopefully Halo 3 ODST...will show some improvements, can't wait.
thoughts?
Whenever i play uncharted all i see is muddy, medium (if that) res textures. super_star98789guess you haven't played gears of war 2....it has its fair share of muddy and medium textures..more so than the first gears...its how the character detail was bumped up.
A) Can i see your crystal ball.. B) Opinion doesn't equal facts C) Just because you never got a RROD doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist D) your a fanboy E) NO ONE will take you seriously. F) putting a smiley at the end of your post doesn't make it look superior.I agree the PS3 really has zero games that are worth playing. Now cows will say different but look at what they liked before, crappy PS2 stuff, so they really don't know better. Its sad really.
Another thing, that darn DS3 controller is such a dinosaur and that is the BIGGEST reason I'm not buying a BluRaystation 3 yet,I need a BluRay player but I might as well get a secondary console for those MGS like games I guess.
Xbox 360 is overall the best console ever. I never got RROD and I own two consoles,that should double my odds too huh.
The games are best on 360, all of them anything you may think is not is just wishful thinking or "fuzzy math".
Wii is just an obamanation to gaming, when old ladies, old man and soccer moms want one that means you suck as a serious gaming platform.
And the PS3 is not what it was made out to be and in the end it is a failure...gigaflops :lol:
-Ninja_Dog-
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"]people forget that the ONLY..i mean ONLY reason the 360 has more quality games is because it LAUNCHED BEFORE the competition, it had almost a year in the market with no competition, devs had no choice, but to jump on the platform and make there next gen games...same goes with the PS2 and it's success. Its nothing to do with the magic of the 360, lol. MS just did a good business move. to bad it cost them, leading to RROD issues, due to the fact that they needed to rush out to achieve it. but heres the thing, even with the 360's HEAD start, it still kinda poor sales wise, and i honestly expected much more. Most likely thanks to the Wii and SONY name...it has stole a lot of sales, because both those companys have made some better moves..here and there. that being said the 360 is a great console hardware wise and software-wise, no doubt about it. diamond2dErm actually you need to do some research, its not because it was firts. Sony could have easily got developers to make games 2 years prior the launch. You need to do some homework son. Face it 360 is much better tham PS3! LOL judging by your spelling and the word "son" your some 12 year old red bull drinking bloody thirsty xbox fanboy. If you think the early foot into the market played NO part in the gaining of those titles, then your in serious denial. Sony can't force developers to make games for there console 2 years in advance, LOL. The 360 at the time was much more attractive and ONLY available HD console, with many developers wanting to be the first to show of there titles. Common sense, Get some. now please SIT DOWN.
i'm starting to hear "wait till 09" now :lol:facebookersame can be said about 360 (what did the 360 have over the PS3 this year?)....hell, its heading to a droubt. Gears 2 is out, whats left...PC ports and some bad RPG's?
Log in to comment