To answer TC's question, the original Mass Effect runs fine on PS3. I owned the whole trilogy on the 360, and it was honestly the only reason I kept that system around. So I was really happy once I heard the original was making its way to PS3. Some of the load times seem a bit longer on the PS3 compared to the 360, like when your starting up the game it takes maybe 10 seconds or so longer to load to the main menu. And the only other difference I noticed is when the game Auto Saves (brings up a disc on screen and says its saving data) on the 360 version you could actually continue on and move around, although the frame rate kinda got choppy, whereas the ps3 verison you cant move at all and just have to wait until it finishes auto saving.

Other than that It seems like they look the same and performs easily on par with the 360 version.

2 words - Personal Opinion

Ok so here is an odd question I have.

I have noticed that crysis on xbox live is $19.99. Not 1600 ms points like any other arcade type transaciton should be. Does that mean I actually have to use my credit card in order to make this purchase or can I actually go to the store and pick up a 1600 ms point card and use that? Because in actuality its still the same amount of money.

I know this is a weird question I just like loading up my gamer accounts with prepaid cards instead of having my own credit card tied to the account.

Thank you for the help! :)

[QUOTE="TH1Sx1SxSPARTA"][QUOTE="MSgamer4lyfe"]Looks Good but failing compared to geow3BloodyFalcon007

Gears looks better.

Although gears does look pretty cool, I think uncharted 3 just has the better "wow " factor going for it. Seems a bit more versitile to me with the amount stuff you can do besides hide behind cover and shoot...

So gears can have the better graphics, ill take the better gameplay.

MY SUGARLUMPS! I almost died laughing the first time I saw that episode.... Im not even kidding in the slightest.

Post related: That video looks very awesome. The sandstorm just goes to shows you naughty dogs attention to detail.

Breath of Fire IV recently was put up onto the PSN as a psone classic. I think its a really addicting RPG...but ya gotta have the taste for it. So if ya dont like JRPG type games Id say pass. But if ya like those kinda games then Id say its quite addicting

FFVIIROCKS

so in all actuallity its not really a psp game....its a psone but you can play it on the psp

Breath of Fire IV recently was put up onto the PSN as a psone classic. I think its a really addicting RPG...but ya gotta have the taste for it. So if ya dont like JRPG type games Id say pass. But if ya like those kinda games then Id say its quite addicting

It doesnt matter provided all else being equal (Mhz, timings, ECC, voltage, etc).

Two sticks of 4 will give you additional expandablity if you want to add 2 more sticks later, though.

XaosII

Ah true, didnt look at it that way

So i for my pc build im wanting to have 8gigs of RAM, and im wondering if its smarter to go wtih 4 sticks that have 2 gigs each...or is it better to go 2 sticks with 4gigs each? Or does it not really matter? Just an interesting question Ive always wondered about.

Gonna save up for a really sick build. So I wont have BF3 by the time it comes out so im half tempted to get it on a console until I complete my pc. but man on man its pc all the way