Alright, just as I was checking out my history of reviews (not like I have many), I came to realise for the first time that people can actually reccomend reviews..wow.

Anyway this brings me up to why people reccommend reviews or not. I see I have a couple of reviews that are reccommended and some that aren't..why even do such a thing? If you don't like the review..go read another one? You know, you can't really get a specific opinion of a game for yourself unless you play it...reading only one review will give you one side of a game, a side some people see the game...and there is another side..which others see that the firs ones didn't...and add 3 billion sides and we are udnerstanding each other.

So basicaly, I don't udnerstand the "reccommendation" thing about reviews since everybody has different opinions on what makes a game pure quality, or a total disaster for this world should have never been born. Reviews are only there to give a point of view, from a style of gamer. So my thing goes...when reading a review, you should be able to see this person's like..top 5 rated games or top 10, to give you an idea of what kind of gamer he is, giving you more strict facts about why he likes or does not like the game..and remove them reccomendation things.

Am I alone to think this would be a good idea?

(no..I'm not whining about people who doesn't reccomend the review, I don't really care to be honest since I write reviews only for the fun of it..I like writting reviews and I REALLY enjoy making my reviews different than what people would consider a "review". But I was just wondering why the heck they put that? It doesn't really make sense to me as I find it pretty useless.)