@Bread_or_Decide: I'm not a trump voter, but I buy MT's. I am 30 years old, with a new born baby and a career where I work 12 hour days. I am lucky to play 4 hours a week in a game. I'm not rich but I have some spare money to throw at hobbies. I fully agree that MT's should not affect the outcome on multiplayer matches, like how Battlefront 2 was. However, if I want to play Overwatch, I don't have the time to grind and HOPE to get a Junkrat skin. I can throw $20 at it increase my odds. I also have no problem with Single player game MT's. I have no problem throwing 20$ at AC: Origins for some cool weapons and stuff that's going to make the 1 hour I play more enjoyable. I understand I probably fall into the minority, but I don't believe people like me are afraid to speak out.
Lol everyone up in arms. This game was better optimized for multi-cores, making the Fx-6350 and Fx-8350 in the "sameish" category as the 6600k and I7-4790 "for this game". Yes, the FX series can not compete head to head with raw horse power of the current Intel chips. And Yes, you will be fine with most of the CPU's you guys have been listing.
My current BF4 folder is 75GB and my WoW folder is over 60GB. Ill gladly accept 50GB
@Darkeus @Fishdude909 It was meant to copy you. Made that pretty obvious. The always online thing is horrible I just feel that EA is now taking all heat for that concept, when a year ago Blizzard did the same thing for Diablo when they didn't have to at all. You can play that game completely solo. However people let off because the game was good. Most people that are complaining about SimCity are the people that dont even own it. I personally am enjoying the game. I like the online features making it seem like multiple cities help each other out in the same county, I see where they were going for it. Now did it have to be Always online instead of choice? I dont think so. My opinion 75%-80% of people will be connected online while playing it anyhow, but doesnt mean you get rid of the choice.
Now that the servers are fixed I really think a Re-review is done like on other games and the review is done on the game itself and not on the problems of the servers
@Darkeus Oh come on. Are all the people at BLIZZARD that dumb? Of course Diablo 3 was DRM. There is absolutely no way it was necessary for it to be online all the time. Nobody wanted that crap.... Every excuse I have seen by BLIZZARD and ACTIVISION smells like the same old BS. This is eerily familiar to the MASS EFFECT 3 debacle that happened JUST A YEAR AGO. Are we not seeing a pattern people? Why are they buying from this untrustworthy company?
Because PEOPLE had wanted a new Diablo for a long time. Beside the fact that they were foolish enough to put faith that Blizzard was actually going to do a good job on this game, people just wanted to get back to a game series they loved. Nostalgia, series loyalty and brand loyalty will get you some sales before Word of Mouth kills it dead if your game is bad....
@Quaxillaz I recently bought it after never playing any other Sim City Game. Though I dont know why it "HAS" to be always online, I do enjoy the online features. Its like you control a city in a county and you can work with the other cities in your county to make your county thrive. Other than that I believe the game runs and looks great. Played about 10 hours in 3 days haven't been kicked off yet. I don't agree with the 5.0 score, Diablo 3 is online only and didn't get nerfed that bad
at ABEzilla116 I dont know, I did a play through as a female on ME2, and attempted to flirt with Kelly every time I was on the ship haha, we had dinner.... I felt a connection lol
at DarkNeoBahamut OMG Thank you, it is optional, the choices you make reflect the outcome, if your "Alan" Shepard and don't want to be gay then I Recommend not flirting with Rick! Lol
Fishdude909's comments