What matters most in games?
by ForTheRepublic on Comments
With Fallout: New Vegas just around the corner, I've been hearing more and more talk about how the game will not live up to the hype because the game uses the same graphics engine as Fallout 3. That means there wont be any major upgrade of the graphics. Personally, I don't understand why this should be important in the long run. While I love to look at highly detailed graphics in games (especially on a machine as powerful as a PS3), it just isn't that important to me if the game itself is solid. Story and gameplay should be the front runners of games, because no matter how realistic the graphics may look if the game just isn't entertaining it wont be worth anybody's time. For example, people (myself included) love the original 007 GoldenEye on N64. Look at it today, and the graphics are awful, te characters are pretty much blocks with guns. But, the game was so much fun to play (deathmatch anybody?) that it didn't matter. Same goes for Vice City on PS2. The graphics were okay but there was so much to do in the game and it was so entertaining and well structured you just didn't notice. Graphics are important and can really lend a lot to a game's character (looking at you God of War III), but you can't let a game's graphics determine whether you play it or not. Developers have gotten into a bad habit of relying to heavily on looks instead of on story and simple fun. Remember the old days when developers couldn't rely on graphics and were forced to focus on the game itself (the NES final fantasy games). Next time your playing a game take a step back from the graphics and just ask yourself "Am I having fun?"
Log in to comment