Apart from higher resolution/anti-aliasing, none of these games look better than the top console games. Modern PCs are obviously far more powerful than consoles, but that doesn't mean much when the available software doesn't take advantage of it.
Dragon Age was one of the most generic games I've ever played, but it was still more fun than ME2. It actually played like an RPG, instead of a poor man's Gears of War.
I would put money down that GT5 will not outsell Reach. GT3 and GT4 were historically huge games, but that was with an historically huge userbase. The attach ratio for Halo games on Xbox is actually much higher than GT's on Playstation, and with a slightly larger userbase this time around, Reach will easily outsell it.
To say one does not believe in God is perfectly rational. To say one knows with 100% accuracy that there is no God is irrational.
Acemaster27
But isn't it irrational to believe in something you can never know? Since there is no evidence, and probably never will be any evidence positive or negative, then belief is based on things other than fact. Therefore any belief (in existence or nonexistence) will be irrational.
There is nothing irrational about not believing in something that has no evidence. It is irrational, however, to ask to prove a negative.
They are short on staff. They've said this many times, so expect them to be late with some games.
Racer_XLR
I don't buy this excuse anymore. Even with a smaller staff, they can't find the time to review a monster game like MW2? There are sites a lot smaller than this onethat don't have any problems getting their reviews out on time, much less for the biggest game of the year.
Well, there needs to be SOME way to tell the difference between metal bands like Iron Maiden, metal bands like Diablo Swing Orchestra, metal bands like Sonata Arctica, and metal bands like Metallica.
MetroidPrimePwn
They sound different from each other. That's how you can tell the difference.
Log in to comment