I have been visiting Gamespot for years now but it was only a few months ago that I decided to become a member and registered. If there's anything that I noticed with Gamespot's DS section is that they do not have a lot of reviews available, and sometimes even if they do, the game has already been released for quite some time. Not that its a bad thing since there are a ton of other websites out there that release early reviews even if the game isn't released yet, but the quality isn't as good as what Gamespot usually has to offer.

Now, because I just recently resigned months ago from my previous employer due to problems that I could no longer bear (and I'm covered by a non-compete bond for a full quarter), I decided to purchase a bunch of games that will keep me busy for a few months. And since I have nothing but spare time right now, I decided to review most of the games that I have ... including my friends, nephew, and gf's collection. However, I'm only going to post reviews for games that hasn't been reviewed by Gamespot or gamers yet. I'll still probably post a review even if one is already available if the game in my opinion doesn't deserve such score. And those are for games that was released around the 2nd quarter of this year, onwards. That of course isn't written in stone and I might still write reviews regardless if its release date etc etc.

I have created less than 20 reviews for the past few days (talk about being bored huh?) and already seen reviews that was created to directly contradict my opinion. I guess maturity and respect sometimes become a problem when you really like/hate a game. I've seen people giving a game a perfect score of 10 or a flat 1 just because they want to drag the overall average up/down.

My opinion is always going to be just good as anyone else's though ... so as unbiased as I consider my reviews are ... read 'em with caution since that's just my take on the game.