She's a typical corrupt democrat who pretends to be a knight in shining armour...
GhostHawk196's forum posts
@dynamitecop: how does it deliver better color than the IPS Asus? Based on the chart you posted it looks like it wins with certain colors and loses with others, so more of a wash....not to mention the Benq's slight superiority in blue in kinda meaningless as the human eye is much less sensitive to changes in blue. The more accurate yellow on the Asus is probably a bigger advantage.
There's a reason if a manufacturer has to sacrifice color depth in video hardware it's usually on the blue channel.
I'm not denying that in those tests that the benq has lowest average error, or wins in some measurement...but that's far from the whole picture.
How could you view that as a wash in any degree?
The red delta is roughly 15% higher, the green delta 5% lower, the blue delta 55% lower, the yellow delta is 20% lower, the cyan delta 30% higher and the magenta delta is 60% lower, it has much more accurate color reproduction overall with far less varied negative swings.
Overall you come up with roughly 95% lower error on the whole color spectrum, that's a big difference.
P.S. The Asus does not have a more accurate yellow.
Cause Dynamitecop only knows how to talk out of his ass... That's why
@dynamitecop: If you can provide some image comparisons showing benq being superior to an asus ips in terms of overall picture quality I will concede defeat otherwise this is just another nonsense thread of you trying to justify why your cheap budget crap is superior to a high end product.
The salt is so real lol.
He's losing his mind because he has a more expensive Asus monitor with weaker color reproduction than the direct competiting BenQ and apparently he doesn't like people pointing out that Nvidia makes money on G-Sync which is entirely the reason they refuse to adopt FreeSync...
The salt is very real.
How the hell do you know what I have? If BenQ really was the superior option I would have bought one but its not so shut the **** up poor boy...
Ok so now that I'm in the mix of new tech again....what exactly is G-sync vs Free Sync.
G-Sync = Nvidia
FreeSync = AMD
G-Sync Monitors cost more because additional hardware and licensing is required.
FreeSync monitors are cheaper because the tech is open source.
Both technologies attempts to sync the rate of rendering with the with the refresh rate of the monitor to prevent screen tearing.
It's a pretty fantastic technology, one of the best innovations for displays in recent years.
So do I need AMD hardware if I want to use Free Sync and same for Gsync monitors.
Yes, it's currently tied to the specific hardware you're running, while in time FreeSync has the possibility to open up to Nvidia, I don't see them supporting it because they can currently charge for it via G-Sync (Another reason I hate Nvidia).
STOP Talking out of your ass and misleading people...
This looks worse than vanilla Crysis...
You are the biggest LEM ever...Please don't call yourself a PC gamer because you are a fraud and a disgrace to the PC gaming community...
Um Asus PG278Q is a TN panel not IPS(I have one) and it's more expensive because G-sync, you can tank nvidia for that, PG278Q is also very old these days, bought mine in 2014...
edit: There are three monitors, there's the PG278Q and the PB278Q, PG278Q is TN, PB278Q is IPS, it still beats both.
Also that doesn't change the fact that the PG278Q has an MSRP of $900 and the XL2730Z has an MSRP of $630.
but why are you comparing the the Benq Freesync to Asus Gsync in price and not to Asus Freesync one(MG278Q)? there is also MG279Q with IPS panel for freesync
Gsync is always more expensive than Freesync...
Cause this guy is a fucking idiot, he tried to argue 2xr9 290x were better than a single gtx1080...understanding, expertise, experience and longevity in the community MY ASS
Log in to comment