And then ppl get mad at me when i say that Bethesda has a long history of releasing half, bugged games.

@GAMERALL Who ever said anything about graphics, do us a favor and don't put words in my mouth, Crysis was a breakthrough in PC gaming, not only because of its graphics, but because it was a game that use all the potential the PC has to offer, and until today its single handed the most hardware demanding Game in history, and thats what I'm talking about, Crysis 2 doesn't even come close to Crysis 1/Warhead. And thats what I'm talking about when i say Breakthrough, I mean a game that can make the best Gaming Rig sweat to run it.

They forgot to mention, how technically inferior the CryEngine 3 is Compared to CryEngine 2, Crysis 2 was a good game, but Crysis and Crysis Warhead were awesome games. I think they should have used the CE3 for the consoles, and an upgraded version of the CE2 for PC, I was truly disappointed with Crysis 2, because alot of ppl like me were expecting another breakthrough in PC gaming.

This is pointless, well in this and most cases, PC ports can run natively at 1920*1080, while consoles can't, thats a good enough reason to buy all my Games for PC, i only have my consoles for the exclusive games like, Uncharted, Killzone, GT5 etc... Id understand something like this if it was made only between Console Ports, but not for portal, since Portal focus allot more in game play then in graphics, and yet has same really good visuals.

That was allot of BIAS, to be all honest DA II, felt like it was said in the GS podcast few weeks ago, a Bioware B-Team game, i think its just ridiculous the way they recycle the same maps over and over and over trow out the game, and after finishing it, I think as a reviewer i would only give it a 7, i liked the new combat mechanics, and the graphics, but the way the story unfold was just horrible, there wasn't any feel of commitment with the story, was just like as @aldronlin said, like a MMO, the story it self was quite good, not what i expected from a continuation from DA:Origins, but still good, also they said that this game Choice Story Driven System was better then DAO, i disagree partially , it didn't feet as comprehensive as in DAO, in DAO i felt my choices had a much more deep impact in the Story and the Game itself then in DA 2. Bioware is good at making this kinda of games, i can't understand how did they screw this one.