Why would anyone with logic compare graphics when they're usually developed with one system in mind and ported to the other. Rarely do you see a game optimized for both systems. It's too time consuming. These graphics comparisons only show the flaws in development, not the game systems. Believe me, both consoles have good looking games and it's pretty retarded for people to take one side over the other because a game looks "better" on one more than the other. If you own either system and you're playing on an HDTV, you'll appreciate the graphics... No need to compare and look for silly details that mean absolutely nothing. Besides, how in hell do you compare two different frames? I'm not a fanboy but I own one system right now. I have a PS3 and I don't own it because it's better, I don't even think it is. I just found it to be the perfect system for me as I do enjoy blu-ray movies. My friend and I mooch off each other's systems when it comes to exclusives, I play Gears2 on his while he struggles to ace all the levels on LBP... We both wish we had more money to spend for the other system so we can play against each other and put the argument about the better CoD player to rest.

Sigh. I can barely see the difference in ANY. It's just difference in the color, which you can set up on your TV and make it look better. Besides, PC beats both in every way and that's coming from a person that owns both consoles. Sad how comparisons keeps on being made. It's bait for retarded fanboys. I love both systems, they both have good exclusives. The multiplatform stuff I'd rather have on PC if it's on it, if not then I get the game on the system that's not getting a lot of usage time. Keeps it balanced.