Look guys, both Crysis 3 and Infamous SS are top looking games and both have pros and cons, we can argue endlessly for which particular effect do you prefer. I do admit with a beefy rig you can crank the settings to ultra with above 1080p res and sure it would look sharper and faster. But the point is Infamous is right in the ballpark if we're talking about 1080p with nice AA and excellent graphics all around. I just find it laughable when some hermit claim Crysis 3 is a generation better or far better etc, the arrogance is just pathetic. Ryse looks good but not in the same league tho, being 900p, very low framerate and super linear just don't cut it for graphics king material any more, games like Crysis 3, Killzone SF and Infamous SS are doing so much more things technically as well as maintaining the iq are simply more impressive period.
No and no. Famous for no shadows looks like ass compared to Crysis 3 and Crysis 3 is generation better technically than any 900pStation game. Keep crying that according to the industry Ryse - Crytek's worst attemp to date on a weakest hardware of the genration still shits on Crapzone: Shadow Fail.
Famous for no shadows in the same ball park as Crysis 3 LMAO. Well I expect a game to atleast have shadow of the main character before making such stupid claims. Fact Crysis 2 from 2011 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 900pStation. Wake me up when your precious exclusive have something over Crysis 2 from 2011. Right now Crysis 2 does everything 1000x better.
Log in to comment