[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] the fact that they don't produce better visuals, they are just more pleasing to you shows you don't know the difference between subjective and objective,savagetwinkie

what about everything else with the lighting, physics, particle effects, actors on screen, lighting, and all those other effects. both uncharted and killzone come up horrendously short if you took everything into account. I know in game explosions/lighting pretty much crysis 2 dominates, I believe it supports more actors on screen, not sure, There is more detail in the enviroment, the enviroments are bigger, the models are more detailed. How can you just ignore everything that makes crysis good and only go for a few things that on paper make uncharted look better.

are you really saying 27fps vs 29 fps is a big difference that matters? 1112x720 vs 1280x720 is a big difference? Both have great animations and I don't know how your measuing draw distance effectively... I will agree with jaggies in crysis 2 is a little crappy but generally I believe crysis offers the better graphical/technical package.

Your picking and choosing things and yoru not taking everything into account, this is why your narrowsited view is completely invalidated. Comparing crysis 2 is much much more proof that 360 is just as powerful as ps3. And generally crysis 2 performed better on 360 more consistently with some larger drops, while both dropped to 15fps in hariy moments. Also its known that the 360 has a crisper image, though the AF was better on the ps3.

[QUOTE="IDoItLikeAboss"][QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] going back to the OP about 360 being able to play ps3 games better... well there isn't any evidence to suggest it couldn't.savagetwinkie

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] Sub HD, Sub 30 Fps, 2 screen tear is facts though, i don't see how this makes it not count as graphics king, its not like uncharted 2/3, killzone 2/3, GoW3, are all perfect either, they just made sacrifices to get the correct ratio for the resolution, and they aren't a solid 30fps except for GoW going back to the OP about 360 being able to play ps3 games better... well t here isn't any evidence it couldn't. But given both systems trying to run the same thing, and 99/100 times its better on the 360 is actual evidence that suggest if you took UC2/3 and built it for the ground up for 360, there is a possibility it could perform better.savagetwinkie

not really 99/100 at all. Portal 2, L.A.Noire, Brink, DNF is just a few examples recently. And we all know the answer lazy developers and ports. Lol why does it matter how they run ugly games when PS3 has much more prettier games which 360 so far isn't even close to.

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="clone01"]Whose this "vast majority of 360 fanboys?" Are you saying Kevin Van Ord is a 360 fanboy? He scored Crysis 2 highly. Yep, that's it, he must be a fanboy. Are you saying I'm a 360 fanboy because I think Crysis 2 looks good?Perhaps you should take a look at your posting history before throwing the fanboy moniker around so casually.And no, its not a night and day difference. See, opinions are fun.savagetwinkie