IDoItLikeAboss' forum posts
[QUOTE="mztazmz"]
maybe some dev should just make the best looking console game ever...............that runs at 10 frames per second
T-razor1
But that's the point Crysis 2 isn't running at 10FPS. It has already been documented in digital foundry that the frame dips do not represent the majority of the gameplay while Lens of Truth has it averaging close to 30FPS at (27.28) according to them which is fine for consoles. This is why the performance argument is weak at best. 10fps? Lol nice exaggeration.
Truth exposed. Just look how blurry and low res crysis 2 is compared to killzone 3. And lol @ the fools who claim kz3 to be blurry. There's simply no way a sub hd game like crysis 2 at 1152 x 720 with crappy temporal aa, low AF, low framerate, bad pop ins, blurry textures can dethrone a true native 1280 x 720 MLAA enabled king like KZ3. lemmings give up already.gpuking
Lol that kz3 shot isn't helping your case :lol: Thanks for reminding me why I think the game is behind Crysis 2 in pure visuals. That pic looks like a mess to me...and what's up with the textures on those rocks? Hmm I thought kz3 had perfect textures? What happened? :)
...and nice job finding one of the most blurriest pics you can find in Crysis 2. Anybody can find bad pics (blurriness, poor textures etc...)
Here's a better representation of the game
Oh yeah back to kz3 and its perfect textures :roll:
...and the awesome effects of Microsoft Paint on this guy's hair :lol:
Yeah this game is so perfect graphically that the effects can't be done anywhere else on a console. Impressive :roll:
When kz3 can do these kind of lighting effects from under water get back to me :|
I don't play screenshots http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CBd6QX8nps[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]And just because you think it looks good(which we know you don't) doesn't mean you can bring it up either. Also Naughty dog was focusing solely on the PS3, with much better knowledge of the PS3 with help from Sony and being much more talented, in other words they're experts at optimizing for the PS3. On the other hand Crytek are experts on PC which is much more similar to 360 than PS3 and they had to split up their focus on 3 platforms so there's no way they could get as much out of the PS3 as Naughty dog or guerilla... which is proven by the ugly, nasty, crappy, blurry, jaggie, garbagy, trashy result. So Naughty dog was focusing solely on the PS3, with much better knowledge of the PS3 with help from Sony and being much more talented, in other words they're experts at optimizing for the PS3. And yet Crysis 2 some how manages to look better than UC 2 despite all the facts u just mentioned. wow Crytek is amazin Oh jesus....another 360 fanboy.... And yet uncharted 2 performs TONS better then crysis 2 on top of already looking better then crysis 2 lol[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] well crysis 2 is a mutliplat that is as good looking as the best ps3 has to offer, considering that people agree and it is a graphical powerhouse even by critic standards you can't just dismis it because you think its ugly. And because we can't break down uc2/kz2/3 and figure out which is doing more, saying they perform better and have a higher resolution isn't a good argument unless you have proof that they don't just look good but they are processing an equal amount of graphical features as crysis 2. to be able to compare it. We also can't assume the dev's were lazy, mostly because its stupid to assume that, there was never any suggestion that they were focused on any one system, and here is a link, http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=23898 , if you really think they were being lazy pleaze provide a that kind of shows how lazy they were. Either way you can't just compare the FPS and some other random facts about the game to produce a fact, they do d. ifferent things, you can speculate but then we get into arguments over which looks better, which is subjective.monatomic
god of war is fixed camera angle bs that game is cheap.ZOOIINHEERRREand......??? The game looks stunning P.s your posts are cheap.
for the 100th time multi plat deveopers port from one system to the other. With the time restraints it simply does not allow them to take full advantage of both systems regardless of the engines being tailored and all the other claims that you keep making with no evidence what so ever so it is not a fair benchmark Answere me this. IF the 360 is so much more capable and powerful AND EASIER to develope for then whe are the best looking games this gen ps3 exclusives And bro you need to get your head checked because YOU are making claims ... forcing your opinions as facts down every ones throats that you cant back up. Instead of pointing the finger when asked for a source "no you" is essentially what your doing, then how about you support YOUR claims that you are making. Pretty much what I've been saying all along but he doesn't seem to understand :? his claims doesn't have to be backed up because they're "developer choices" or it's just "known" Hahahaha You could tell 360 fanboys that the sky is blue and they would argue that its not blue but black .....and that black>blue anyways They can ask you for a source but god forbid you ask them for a source because apparently its YOU that needs to provide a source that the sky is NOT black other wise the sky is black You could tell them, well LOOK AT THE @#$*#@! SKY!!!!! And they would still argue it to the death on behalf of a cheap piece of plastic (the 360)and billion dollar company that could care less about them(m$) And the sad this is, for how bad savage is, he's still not half as bad as karateechop and all the other die hard 360 fanboys om sw.[QUOTE="IDoItLikeAboss"][QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] you have been repeating the same thing over and over and pulling **** out of your ass saying dev's are lazy ,
again prove ps3 exclusives do more, the entire basis of you argument in the first place is just missing, i think kz3/uc2/gow are great looking games, i just think crysis 2 is better.
In the end, the only way to validly benchmark two systems is with the same piece of software or measurement, you can't do that with the exclusives, regardless of whether or not they do more is irrelevant because its speculation at best, and this is what you don't seem to get, you and charlse keep side stepping this, this is the core to my argument, and you haven't produced one counter argument that can even falter it. You can't measure teh exclusives, then all you can derive from them is speculation and opinions. That is a fact.
Its the best looking multiple that completely contends with the exclusives, its the best we really have to compare the two systems. I'm giving you a crazy run around on purpose, you can't back up your arguments because there isn't enough information available to prove it, the only solid thing we can look at to break down each systems performance is crysis 2 right now. You pull **** out of your ass to down play it saying they focused on the 360 version and did a quick port. when rage comes out we'll have more information, but based on a lot of arguments here, it'll be graphics kind because its target is 60fps and it will be 720 and higher fps than kz/uc and just flat out win regardless of what it does.
charlesdarwin55
This Not only that but some of the best games ive played this gen have been ps3 exclusives but thats a discussion for another day:)Some people (360 fans) really just can't accept what the rest of us have known all generation long. The PS3 is more powerfull, it has the better looking games. Just let it go. It's getting kind of... Just let it go.
JohnDead80
Where is your proof that it was specifically tailored to each console? Oh yeah and im still waiting on the source to your original claims as well. Will you be providing that any time soon too? Also, you obviously didnt watch the video because that was a vid of K3 and C2 NOT UC2 LMAO And Bro this is like the third time you have used this halo example word for word lol. Give it up bro. Its was ridiculous back then and its still ridiculous now. P.s Just going by your posts i cant imagine the type of engineer you are lol they said they had 3 dev teams all trying to surpass each other on the engine, the assets were reused on all 3 consoles. If you can provide links for you argument of them being lazy and focusing on the 360 I'll bother to provide links for my counter argument. and i did watch it, the biggest differences i noticed was the water physics in kz3, and the self shadows, but they didn't have an example if there were any self shadows in crysis, the particle effects were better in crysis, so were the models, animations were just as good, and while they had really detailed environment in both, the immediate environment was a lot smaller all round in kz3, and both had great looking background areas. So w/e its not enough to prove me wrong or right, its just a couple of off screen videos of a simple comparison.[QUOTE="IDoItLikeAboss"][QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] Regardless of whether or not it was ported, it was still tailored to each system, and it doesn't matter how many issues it has, its a game that was made for each system and strives to pull off equally the same effects and recreate them on each system. This is why there are technical issues, this is why its a good bench mark because seeing the different issues on each system gives us a lot more information than Uncharted 2 ever will comparing the two systems. and regardless of what you may or may not believe, uncharted 2 look great has no baring on what the 360 can and can't do, so its irrelavent. It can't be proven it in a technical sense is trying to do more, so saying it looks nicer means crysis doesn't do as much is purely speculation. This is true with any exclusive. Its like me saying halo reach doesn't look as good but with the dynamic lighting system and using it with 40 ai and 20 vehicles, that supports real time physics on all of those characters plus huge levels designed around being more of a sandbox with linear progression proves that 360 is more powerful. Its impossible to prove me wrong. Its an opinion and speculation just like uncharted 2 doing more than any 360 game is an opinion and speculation.savagetwinkie
I'm giving killzone 3 a nod where i think it should and its mostly the water physics, everythign else i didn't really find all that impressive and it wasn't a good all encompassing comparison.
Right I used the halo one over and over again, doesn't it sound absurd when someone says something that has no basis for anything over and over again. You should re read your pts and realize its about the same with all of your arguments.
Are you kidding me? YOU made that claim. The burden of proof is on you to support that claim And obviously when i used the word lazy it wasnt meant to be taken 100% literal
Log in to comment