lol, i would put the appluase gif but im too lazy to find it :PI see a flaw in his analysis. He is correct. The north pole of a magnet attracts the south pole of a magnet but repels the north pole of another magnet. This is true. But MAGNETS are very strongly attracted to other MAGNETS. Magnets arent however attracted to plastic or cheese but to other magnets. Magnets only repel each other when the north side touches the other's north side. So if we extrapolate this to men, MEN are attracted to MEN but "Jimmy Johnsons" are not attracted to each other and arent meant to connect. Thats why gay men put their "Jimmy Johnson"(male north pole) in the other man's "Bongo Hole"(male south pole).
Based on my research we should FORCE gay marrage.
Wheres my Noble Prize Please? :cool:
Diablo-B
II_Seraphim_II's forum posts
So only GS scores matter? Not the countless other sites that gave it superb marks?monkeytoes61Yup, only GS scores matter. Those were the rules everyone here on SW agreed on.
Being a historic brand is not a good enough reason imo. You could consider slavery an American past time, don't mean it should still be there lol. I think it should have been changed a long time ago.The name personally doesn't really bother me but I certainly see the issue and why it's offensive to American indians. I think eventually it should be changed, but it's a historic brand. Not just the name of a sports team. It's not as easy as just switching the name and being done with it.
Pirate700
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"] lol, that is pretty much irrelevant because both consoles have console-exclusive reviewers. What I mean is, it would only be relevant if the exact same people who reviewed it on X360 reviewed it on PS3, but thats not the case. There are certain publications that only do X360 reviews, and others that only do PS3 reviews, so its hard to compare the 2 scores. The only way would be to gather all the multiplat review publications and get a metascore for both consoles.seanmcloughlin
welcome to the joke
You would think its a joke, but sadly a lot of people on SW would think its a serious and valid comparison.[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]Damn. Shots fired. lol, that is pretty much irrelevant because both consoles have console-exclusive reviewers. What I mean is, it would only be relevant if the exact same people who reviewed it on X360 reviewed it on PS3, but thats not the case. There are certain publications that only do X360 reviews, and others that only do PS3 reviews, so its hard to compare the 2 scores. The only way would be to gather all the multiplat review publications and get a metascore for both consoles.uh oh cows
bbkkristian
In all fairness, we have seen movies be slammed because they pushed "Scientology" agenda, and no one seems to have a problem with that. Or movies be bashed for supporting racism or what not. Same applies with music. You wouldnt go out and support racist music (not unless ur racist). So I feel that if we are to take Video Games as a valid form of art, it should to viewed in the same light. Yeah sure, you can say "well its GTA, its supposed to be funny like that! Its a satire" but perhaps it really is offensive and not done in a tasteful manner. While I dont think that that's something that would put me off buying the game, Ms. Petite's views are valid, even if you dont agree with them. :?[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="BigBoss154"]
Yeah, that irked me quite a bit. I mean come on, the entire game is a god damn satire of the US and its problems so why focus on that?
The score is fine, but that line...
Lumpy311
No they aren't.
Shit reviewer.
lol, just cause you dont agree with her doesnt make her a shit reviewer. Heck I didnt agree with McShea's review of TLOU, and even though I do believe he purposely trolls sometimes, his views are valid. I played the game and saw the validity of some of his claims, the only difference is I didnt feel they affect the game so much as to drop the score to an 8.0. Until we play GTAV we wont truly know if what Petit is saying is true. Will just have to wait and see.
Log in to comment