Calling the Russian background weird doesn't really scratch the surface on its oddity. The mere reply to another was to provide enjoyment/entertain the extreme right? Is any tweet by Musk entertaining another? Perhaps we have different expectations of what level of content Twitter provides, including whom it stems from. Plus, why would what people reply to another have any bearing on Elon?
Huh? You still got to copy and paste another article? Lol What is basic English about it? The publications used terms like "appears" which is a subjective inference, is it not? You're welcome to believe it as well, however it's more beneficial when you actually use critical thinking instead of relying on others to think for you which is why I continue to ask you to type instead of copy/paste.
I see your point now though, for when you say a reply by Elon garners millions of views so his content should be more impartial when it comes to addressing rapidly evolving events instead of tip toeing into unverifiable information, then that's a reasonable take. Ambiguity can create division or in this case, angry keyboard warriors.
You're not as high and mighty as you think. You don't understand the word "appears" better than anyone here. Try that critical thinking, because you're falling behind.
Who said anything about high and mighty...Is that how you view the interwebs? Trying to give the Utah salt flats a run for its money?
I'm being super tribal right now.
Log in to comment