InaneAnanity's forum posts

Avatar image for InaneAnanity
InaneAnanity

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 InaneAnanity
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
Heck, boycott the game because it completely blows. Even without this meltdown, Gamespot should be ashamed to have plastered that completely awful game on the site for as long as it did.
Avatar image for InaneAnanity
InaneAnanity

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 InaneAnanity
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

Just to start, a message for Mr. Larson: I am the "casual" gamer you seem so desperate to appeal to.

I've been visiting gamespot faithfully for over a decade, mainly for their reviews, but also for previews, screenshots, videos etc. for games I am anticipating. I became initially attracted to gamespot for their honesty and integrity in reviewing; I wanted to know when a game was good and when it wasn't, and through the years I came to trust gamespot more than other websites in this regard.

In the past few years that trust has wavered a bit. More than once I've purchased a game and found it buggy or screwed up (recent Maddens, anyone?) despite a relatively high gamespot review. I was wondering whether the advertising was having an effect on these reviews.

Jeff Gerstmann's firing has removed any and all doubt that remained. It's a pity that this site has become subject to and consumed by advertiser's interests, since it was such a beacon for gamers before. What worth does a website have if everything it puts out there needs to be vetted by game companies? If that's what we wanted, we would just read press releases to decide whether to purchase a game. What made this website so valuable to me was the detail and honesty of the reviewers. If they said a game was good, I knew it was good. If they said it was bad, I knew it was bad. And I knew these things without shelling out my hard-earned money and wasting time playing the game myself.

Larson (and others), THIS is why this website has had such high traffic. If you remove THIS, the traffic will go down. And that traffic is what produces advertising interest in the first place, and what determines how much money you make on that advertising.

You may win the battle for control over the company's message, but in so doing you will kill it. Gamespot won't be worth anything by the time you are done running things. Enjoy putting that on your resume Larson. 2007-whenever: ran Gamespot into the ground.

I'll head elsewhere for my game information. Maybe wherever Gerstmann ends up, assuming he stays on the media side of things. Otherwise I'll have to do some digging, but rest assured that it won't be Gamespot any longer.

Avatar image for InaneAnanity
InaneAnanity

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 InaneAnanity
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

Just to start, a message for Mr. Larson: I am the "casual" gamer you seem so desperate to appeal to.

I've been visiting gamespot faithfully for over a decade, mainly for their reviews, but also for previews, screenshots, videos etc. for games I am anticipating. I became initially attracted to gamespot for their honesty and integrity in reviewing; I wanted to know when a game was good and when it wasn't, and through the years I came to trust gamespot more than other websites in this regard.

In the past few years that trust has wavered a bit. More than once I've purchased a game and found it buggy or screwed up (recent Maddens, anyone?) despite a relatively high gamespot review. I was wondering whether the advertising was having an effect on these reviews.

Jeff Gerstmann's firing has removed any and all doubt that remained. It's a pity that this site has become subject to and consumed by advertiser's interests, since it was such a beacon for gamers before. What worth does a website have if everything it puts out there needs to be vetted by game companies? If that's what we wanted, we would just read press releases to decide whether to purchase a game. What made this website so valuable to me was the detail and honesty of the reviewers. If they said a game was good, I knew it was good. If they said it was bad, I knew it was bad. And I knew these things without shelling out my hard-earned money and wasting time playing the game myself.

Larson (and others), THIS is why this website has had such high traffic. If you remove THIS, the traffic will go down. And that traffic is what produces advertising interest in the first place, and what determines how much money you make on that advertising.

You may win the battle for control over the company's message, but in so doing you will kill it. Gamespot won't be worth anything by the time you are done running things. Enjoy putting that on your resume Larson. 2007-whenever: ran Gamespot into the ground.

I'll head elsewhere for my game information. Maybe wherever Gerstmann ends up, assuming he stays on the media side of things. Otherwise I'll have to do some digging, but rest assured that it won't be Gamespot any longer.