ppl keep on going on and on about bench marking saying "OOOHH on bench mark tests the ps3 out performs the 360 in everyway with its cell" in my opinion its the games they should be testing, sure the ps2 had 10,000 or more games but how many can you remember? How many broke records? How many...were of halo's standards. No matter the hardware if you don’t have the grate developers (which Microsoft evidentially dose) what’s the point in building a console which has too much power for its own good. Now don’t get me wrong I hate Microsoft as much as the next person with more intelligence than a worker bee. But they have produced a better console quicker, with better games and far far cheaper than Sony, and if the ps3 is better than the xbox360, well IT SHOULD BE!!! After all it’s had 2 years since the release of the xbox to improve!!! I also note that very few ps3 fans have posted there opinions here, too ashamed to show yourselves? Not surprised!!!
JamboBond's comments