We think we know exactly what type of games we like and then out of no where we are proven wrong. Games are like food; we sometimes have to give it a few tastes before we can claim that we'll never try it again.

Last December I finally confessed that I did not like turn-based games. I take it back! Please forgive me. :) I think a part of the problem was how I did not understanding the current generation of turn-based strategy games.

I recall UpInFlames and RK-Mara trying to convince me that Civilization 4 game was worth a try. I honestly could not get away from the haunting memories of Gettysburg multiplayer. It was blocking me from trying to figure out how to play the Civilization 4 game. Now that my personal computer is dead (yes, that's another story), over the weekend I rented Civilization Revolution on the Xbox 360. I have to say this game is super fun and a bit addicting. I plan to purchase it soon. I actually missed a school assignment over it yesterday. gah! The good news is that I've already racked up about 16 achievements for the game. :)

The question I have about Civ Rev is this... how different is this game compared to Civilization 4 PC version?