At least with the PC you can mess with almost any kind of setting whether be graphics, sound, and even controls to anyway you want it to be. On consoles I tend to notice you can only mess with a few. Some game allows brightness control and some of the games that allows that even allows contract control. Only a handful of games will only allow control anyway you want it to be and I'm not talking preset controls either. I have a PS3 mainly cause I see alot of games that come out for 360 is also out for the PC anyways. Don't get me wrong, I don't hate the 360. I think it's a great system. I just don't see the point in having it if I can do more on PC. PS3 games tend to only be on PS3, sure developers are lazy to learn the development kits (or whatever it is that is supposedly hard to learn programing). I just think Microsoft does a better job at helping developers make games while Sony only spends time with developers on first party game. Look at Uncharted and it's just announced predecessor, it looked really good for 720p (too bad it wasn't even 1080). Gameplay was fun and no framerate drops or anything. I liked it alot. Then we look into multi-platform games. Just like some of you that played multi-plaform games have tried it out on both system console wise and because of it I have the right to say which works better and surely 360 defeats on most games because it seems likemicrosoft knows how to help developers. I'm tired of seeing people say PS3 is better or 360 is better if they haven't even tried the other console. Surely pride to one console (denial about the other) doesn't help either if you did tried on the other console. Graphically, I don't care what anyone says. PC has it's superiority. Mainly cause I'm sure developers of the games knows how a PC runs. Many developers doesn't seem to know how to even run half of the processing power of the PS3 yet. (which is why I believe it's a cheated technology that shouldn't exist yet but it does). I'm not a programmer but from what it looks like since 360 is a microsoft thing, the development kit doesn't seem very different from a PC just with minor adjustments. From what I hear with the PS3 it's something completely different and new. Everyone had to learn from the ground up. I could be wrong I wouldn't know. So I don't think none of us, consumers, reviewers, me, and the developers should have the right to say which platform is the best at graphics, gameplay, framerate, etc especially when I haven't even heard of a game that uses more than 80% of the PS3's cell processing power. Developers do have the right to say which platform is easy to develop games on. I can see potential in the PS3 and believe in it, PC can always be upgraded and the 360 will always have it's games.
It seems like in details, Fallout3 and StarWars:TFU looks better on the 360. In terms of color, The PS3 seems like it has more color and make the game more alive because of it, except Fallout3 and Madden09. I am a playstation owner and happy with it cause alot good games on 360 comes out of PC anyways. But 360 is cool too with a lively community. I still like my PS3 cause when a game is exclusive, it won't even be out for the PC. And believe me, I don't hate the 360.
I swear I heard sony is putting a minimum limit of graphics or something else. Wouldn't people want to buy games because they are good? I mean, sure graphics is a big deal to the majority of us but having 2D games with good graphics on the PS3 wouldn't be a bad thing.
JpnFfantasy's comments