(Pardon my English speaking)

 

I got to play Halo Three and am wondered. Is this what we may be buying in the markets everyday? It do seem very much a like fabulousen Halo Two.

My asking is may I find Halo Three when out as an update for Halo Two? I no ownership a Xbox 360 Console for I ownership first Xbox Console.

 

Very much thank you.

NamanOWNSyou

The most pathetic halo bashing yet. :roll: 

[QUOTE="NextGenNow"]

1. The EDGE has drastically reduced bad games since its initial use. We can see high quality games now with little time and little effort because the EDGE has rectified earlier problems. (no more FEARS)

2. FF XIII and FF Versus XIII are now confirmed as exclusive for PS3. With some devs going so far as to insult 360 hardware. Ouch guess we are gonna hear about how the games are for wusses huh? I already read a few threads highlighting FF games "downfall" lol.

3. Killzone 2....This series went from 6.9 to 8.5...I frimly believe this game will skyrocket to 9.5 (ish)

Halo 3 has been going downhill ever since Halo 2 butchered the story. The novels? Even they have been gettin worse..

4. 7.1 and true 1080p with free online and wireless bluetooth...need I say more? Cuz I can.

SeanBond

1. Wait, F.E.A.R. just came out, and yet you're claiming that EDGE is already making a difference? In what, exactly? Screenshots?

2. Final Fantasy isn't the system seller it once was; FFXII didn't do nearly as well here as it should've, given the install base. The 360 has plenty of support from Mistwalker (in many ways the "real" Square these days), and even has Square's own "The Last Remnant". I'd say that's pretty decent J-RPG support. Also, I personally agree that the Final Fantasy series is on the way down (ever since VIII, probably), but to each his own.

3. Are you saying that since Killzone Liberation or whatever for the PSP did better, this means Killzone 2 will be good for the PS3? Please; the games aren't even particularly similar. I still have absolutely NO idea why cows hype Killzone 2 so much, when there are no gameplay videos, and no screenshots of it, and the first game was subpar.

4. Do you need to say more? Yes. I agree that 7.1 is better than 5.1, but honestly, that's not really a system seller, as 5.1 is perfectly fine, too. True 1080p? I'm assuming you're referring to Sony's catchphrase "True HD", but let's check facts: Both the 360 and 360 elite are capable of 1080p. Component will display up to 1080p in games, VGA will do it for both games and HD-DVDs, and obviously HDMI will do the deed. You want to talk about "true 1080p", how about not having any HD cables in the box? How about having few 1080p games (and if you look at the list of 1080p games, half of them are crap anyway)? Maybe you should stop buying into Sony PR b.s., and do your own research. Free online? You get what you pay for, buddy. Does everyone you play with have a bluetooth headset online? No? Is the online service unified for all games? No? Can you rent HD movies and buy HD TV shows? No? Is your MSN Messenger linked up to your account? No? Can you play games against the PC? No?!? Hmmm...Need I say more? Cuz I can...

nice. owange APPROVED. I'm going to reference your post when i need to do some cow ownage myself. 

Is this actually confirmed? this article has nothing to back it up and it seems somewhat misinformed- quoted "(Remember, folks, before Gears of War, Microsoft was selling their first-party titles for the old standard of $49.99.)" Gears of War was not first party. Seeing as how this is the only site that says this, i would not trust itEducated_Gamer

yeah, gears was by epic...hm 

I don't like to use buzz words like TLHBO, but I really couldn't find any other title to describe the ownage here.

When asked by Newsweek's N'Gai Croal why Shadowrun on the Xbox 360 cost $10 more than the identical PC version, Microsoft Games Studios' corporate vice president could have simply said "because we can." (Remember, folks, before Gears of War, Microsoft was selling their first-party titles for the old standard of $49.99.).

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/14/shane-kim-on-shadowruns-10-pc-to-360-price-difference/

loco145

All next gen games are 60.00 bucks. excluding the Wii.

But game prices have been increasing by 10 bucks every generation. I think 60 is the cap though. 

shows how dependent they are on halo...does this not reek of desperation?xboxrox11

Not really.

MS is dependent on windows...you know...that little thing you're probably using right now.

It's just an advertising campaign. It's not that big of a deal. Nor should it be in SW. 

Is it safe to say that EBGames doesnt know crap

and that Sony is far from dead

Ig-Nor-Rant

R-Dot-Yung

I like how you call him ignorant...look at your sig.

HYP-O-CRITE. 

Sure the PS3 can win. The Wii will probably be replaced by a better Nintendo console in 5 years, which means the PS3 has 5 years to make up the gap. RahnAetas

The wii has like a 2 year shelf life. Actually.

] [QUOTE="KAS3Y_JAM3Z"][QUOTE="nowakawon"]

My head is about to explode. I'll start with an about me. I'm 16 and I live in Austi, Texas. I love video games. I love halo. I am a lemming.

Now, to get to the point. Your logic isn't making sense to me. Other then Halo, I haven't really ever played a series game. However I'll take God of War for example. God of War 2 was very much like God of War. I'll take SSB now. SSB is an awesome game series. And with every new one they are essentially the same, yet have improved on one another to make a better game. Halo and Halo 2. While there are some large differences, they are still VERY similar. Some would argue, but Halo 2 is an improvment on Halo. It's called a god damn sequel my friends. Halo 3 isn't met to be an RTS, or turn into a 3rd person shooter, or become a RPG. No, Halo 3 is supposed to be HALO. This **** is tiring. Maybe it's because i'm in systems wars.. and there is no logic here.

mjarantilla

great post. That's a really good way to sum everything up really.

agreed 100%

It's opinion really. So no, you fail. 

The games he used were good games, and their sequels were also good, because they didn't stray too far from their original gameplay. Halo 3 isn't any different.

Get over ittt 

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]

why do people assume that the sequel to a great franchise always has to be a revlutionary and ground breaking as the first?

If halo had sucked, no one would care if halo 2 or 3 didnt.

because halo was one of the best games of last gen, people compare its successors to its success.

Its foolish to assume that halo 2 or 3 could be as ground breaking as halo 1. If it aint broke dont fix it. Keep the same formula and make a great game.

People like you who expect each entry in the series to be as revolutionary as the first are delusional.

mjarantilla

Was equipment in halo 2? no. which makes halo 3...common lemme hear it... DIFFERENT.

equipment alone changes gameplay in MP.

[QUOTE="nowakawon"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="kenmid"]

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]I'm not hearing too much about it that warrants much excitement. I mean, with GTA IV, I was just excited to have such a heavily detailed city. I can work with that. But for Halo 3.....I'm not sure exactly what I should be excited for, other than the end of the story. And even THAT is not guaranteed. All we've seen are multiplayer videos, but the multiplayer looks exactly the same with some added graphical polish. It's not remarkably different like Gears' multiplayer was. It just looks like the same vanilla multiplayer Halo has always had. Unless they start announcing some campaign details soon, I think Halo 3 might get a score as low as an 8.6 or 8.8.mjarantilla

What are you expecting from Halo 3? You know how Halo 1 was, you know how Halo 2 is. So why would there been any difference from Halo 3. I don't understand what people are expecting. Gears of war is a great game but do you think Gears 2 will be any different. (By the way, every game website is pretty much saying the same thing, Halo plays like Halo; Any we should't be upset with that.

Equipment, huge graphical improvements, physic changes, 3rd-person power weapons, better online, new game types, new customization options, new vehicles, vastly improved and changed weapons, new weapons, new grenades, hell it's beta and bungie has even stated there are something you won't see now but will be there when the game is released.

when you pick up a turret it goes to 3rd person and you can shoot it.

there is a lot of new stuff in it. You're still basing your opinion over a very small portion of knowledge and of content that you have seen.