EXACTLY!!!! some atheists are so ignorant they bypass the fact that the stuff in the old testament isnt meant to be taken literally. you know its impossible for the world to of started from 2 people and the church knows it too. old testament isnt to be taken in word for word.
Then how IS it to be taken as? Metaphor? Sorry, but taking the Bible as ANYTHING but a literal defacto account of what happened invalidates it's status as an absolute religious artifact.
Look at it this way - if, for example, the story of Noah's Ark is a metaphor and not an actual event that took place (which it didn't, it's mathematically impossible, even more so than the Adam and Eve story, which is why a lot of Christians say it's "metaphor") or if something as important to the entire Christian model of creation such as the Adam and Eve story is said to be mere symbolism, then why not follow that logic path a little further? What if God himself is a metaphor, and not an actual sentiment being? If there are metaphors in the Bible, if we aren't sure which parts should be taken factual and which should be taken symbolically, then what's to stop me from saying that God is nothing but mere symbolism as well?
On top of that, I'd like to add something else as it relates to the whole Adam / Eve story that I think is fairly important;
Maybe I'm just not up to date which all the various new interpretations of the Bible, but the last I checked, the reason we have to accept Jesus as our "Savior" is because he died for our sins, and the reason he did that was because Eve took the apple and corrupted human nature. Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I'm pretty sure I'm not. What this means, assuming the Adam / Eve story is just that - a story, and not an actual event - then why did Jesus die for our sins? Perhaps he didn't die for our sins? Perhaps that's metaphor as well?
Log in to comment