why do people think paying for live is wrong, is it because theres a free service out there, how many of you guys complaining about live pay for gamespot when you get the same basic funtions for free. sure you get faster downloads and no ads plus tournaments but you don't need to pay to go on the forumsor anything else. my point is paying for services is not bad just because otheres offer theres for free. i pay you don't i get more features thats how it works anywhere else.

I would like to see these numbers he's using cause from the numbers we have 360 soundly beats the wii

XBOX 360 - 3,731,000

WII - 3,093,000 - w/o wii play it's 2,221,400

thats a difference of 638,000 just in the top ten and thats if you count wii play which i personally think we shouldn't but anyway.

Now if you add some more numbers that we know like mass effect foe 360 and Nights and UC for wii it looks like this.

XBOX 360 - 4,132,000

WII - 3,330,800

Thats a difference of 801,200 with wii play. I know thers a ton more games we don't have numbers for but a 800,000 difference is not easy to make up plus there are more 360 games aswell so like i said i wish we had all the numbers because it seems sketchy to me.

The stories souce is vgchartz though, I thought that wasn't credible.

It's understandable that the law should be changed...but he did break the law.

It doesn't matter how stupid the law is, if you break it, you should get punished.

FragStains

I don't buy that, laws are ment to protect people not stop you from feeding a starving person, I wouldn't obey this law ethier it's the most outragous piece of crap i have ever seen