I was looking into some old reviews and got to a review of Folklore, and noticed the rate "7" that the senior editor Kevin VanOrd, I have this game, it is an average game, and lacked the trophies system from PSN to give you more, but ok, 7 is an ok rate or would be if i had not found other reviews of far better games with the same rate, how can you make a identical rate between Folklore and Tales of Graces f... it's just stupid, can't even think about it, even if the release dates were to come at my view, since folklore is way older than tales of graces f, but the games are simply not equal in rate, tales is too much more of a game than folklore could ever had been, i sometimes think if we should give the reviews all the hype we give them, because, some... actually the most are entirely messed up.