Understandably. I just like the idea of playing some of my favorite ps3 games wherever I go, and as history showed us the original psp's best games were off of it ps2, and 3's biggest franchises. Does that make sense to you?My demand for any system comes from the games I want on it.
So it's currently $0. Don't really care for the games I've seen so far. The tech behind the games ain't gonna make me care any more about the system.
Raymundo_Manuel
Lable1985's forum posts
Ok, so it's finally here, gut reactions are out, and I'm sure we've all got some cemented opinions about it already. Fanboys being fans hate it cause its(insert ignorant hate speech here) and other fans boys are hyping the ever loving matches out of it, but lets all be civil for this so as I, I mean we, can make a point somewhere within the fiery the buzz.
What I'm going to do is list out what kind of specs the psp2 is boasting, and you are going to tell me without much bias what think is a reasonable price for this system is on the polls....
CPU:
ARM Corte-A9 core (4 core)
GPU:
SGX543MP4+
External Dimensions:
Approx. 182.0 x 18.6 x 83.5mm (width x height x depth) (tentative, excludes largest projection)
Screen:
(Touch screen) 5 inches (16:9), 960 x 544, Approx. 16 million colors, OLEDMulti touch screen (capacitive type)
Rear touch pad:
Multi touch pad (capacitive type)
Cameras:
Front camera, Rear camera
Sound:
Built-in stereo speakers, built-in microphone
Sensors:
Six-axis motion sensing system (three-axis gyroscope, three-axis accelerometer)
Three-axis electronic compass
Location
Built-in GPS
Wi-Fi location service support
Keys/Switches:
PS button
Power button
Directional buttons (Up/Down/Right/Left)
Action buttons (Triangle, Circle, Cross, Square)
Shoulder buttons (Right/Left)
Right stick, Left stick
START button, SELECT button
Volume buttons (+/-)
Wireless Communications:
Mobile network connectivity (3G)
IEEE 802.11b/g/n (n = 1x1)
(Wi-Fi) (Infrastructure mode/Ad-hoc mode)
Bluetooth 2.1+EDR (A2DP/AVRCP/HSP)
That's a lot of amazing high tech hardware. I even here the graphics rival that of the ps3(weather or not thats true I don't know, but it's worth considering for the future) So from what I'm reading I'd say I'm willing to pay(at most) 350 - 400$ for this game system. Sure that's pricey for a game system, a hand held no less however let me justify. From what it promises with this kind of tech what I'd be buying is basically a current generation consol I can take anyware. Lets put this in prospective. I could play mgs4 in a box, while I'm in the game sneaking around in a box, while, at the same time, I'm online with other people, in a box!
[QUOTE="93BlackHawk93"]But Kinect sold well, and is really a great piece of technology, whether or not you are using it for PC hacks or not. It made MS money.... so, Kinect isn't dead. Nether are dead. It's just that since both of them are out in the open now we lose interest in them after their initial excitement wore off. Personally I think both of them will rise in topics again once the something big comes out on one or the other that really takes advantage of their soft ware. Personally I've gotten a good use out of my Move with games like Heavy Rain, and tumble, so it's far from collecting dust in my coffee table.Dead like Kinect.
yoshi_64
Ok, so I was playing RDR the other night, and I happened across someone who knew how exploit the glitches in the online of the game. This is when I decided to compile, and edit a video together about many of the glitches I ran into(I know not very original), and hope to record some unintentionally hilarious stuff which is nearing the end of my video. I added in some insight as to how you can create these glitches, and what you can do while exploiting them while adding in a few humorous quips. I did run into a few problems though concerning the horrid windows movie maker while editing this, but I think I did pretty good for a first timer at making these kind of vids. So tell me at the end of the video how it was, what my problems where, and what I need to improve on. One more thing btw, how do I record directly off of a TV so I don't have to point a camera at it to make these videos?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eLoP8zlxYg
HD: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eLoP8zlxYg&hd=1
I'd have to say that COD4 was the best seeing as how WaW, MW2, and Bo all basically use the gameplay from COD4.ULTIMATEZWARRIOWell its kinda hard to improve on the perfect gameplay from CoD4, so I don't see it ever changing. Though I feel all the games still have a great variety(via stingle player set piece moments, and the tweaks in multiplayer design) that separates them from one another.
Well it was clear it spent for time on build actual content than spit polishing a graphics. Its far from being rushed out, but I guess MW2 still looked better. I just find the lack of options in MW2 a little lackluster than in BO which is why I think BO is the better game.MW2 > WAW > BO...
BO has really bad graphics in MP...it's like they rush out the product....
oajlu
I was giving my own opinion dude. I don't care if there's another link to it.sticky at the top of the board.
HavocV3
It basically has elements from every call of duty thus far, and has the biggest bang for your buck . It has the most varied gamplay of the series, and is far better balanced than MW2 with the exception of the noobtube, but at least you have to option to kick the turd off the game if he bugs you. That, and the customization is an amazing new addition, and the ability to use credits to unlock what you want make the game far less of a grind to get your favorite load outs. Now I just love this game, and that's purely because it added everything I wanted in a CoD game thus far. I like to think of it as a mix of all the recent CoD games, but far better. So I know there's going to be a lot of criticism for this game because, well people on this site hated MW2. I'm curious what'd you guys think of it?
Log in to comment