[QUOTE="Miguelrc481"]1st of all I never said that you needed to read master poets to become a better poet. I said he needs to read some master poets to gain a foundation to pursue his craft. Full_Metal shows talent that I cannot deny but it is essential to every poet to read other poets! You say that there are people in the world capable of creating artworks on their own without the foundation of another and I agree; however, that level of talent is sparse, constituting maybe one out of every one-hundred painters. To say that Full_Metal doesn't need to read master poetic works to become better - that it will simply happen - is the height of arrogance for one pursuing his or her craft. When you desire to be a novelist you must read novels and gain the appropriate knowledege neccesary to pursue that craft; sure, Charles Dickens could maybe write a complex sentence by the age of five not even knowing what it was but there is no doubt that his devotion to the art of the novel; reading, writing, re-writing, etc.. made him one of the best novelists of all time. You may argue that poetry is different and I agree; some poets have the "poetic gift" so to speak but the majority learn over time. That is the only reason why I suggest to Full_Metal that he read; specifically more Iambic Pentameter poems, because I see he lacks background in that area. His works are no doubt solid but as someone who has taken over four ccollege classes in Creative Writing and is majoring in English I feel that he could benefit as a writer from my advice:Dhonkyjoe
It's a difference of opinions, that's all. Much like how you use "1st" yet I would use "First". I no doubt give it to you that reading others works is a great way to strengthen your own techniques yet when you when too much into others work; sometimes you find yourself trying to create works like those you've seen instead of original pieces. Take for example, in the majority of my classes I've noticed that my English teachers have given me a different answer each time for how and when to use a semi-colon. My work is far from being perfect (in fact, no one's work is ever perfect - there are always differences in preferences). However, you do bring up solid points and having background knowledge in certain types of poetry makes it easier to create a swift and easy-going poem.
Just think about this though: a lot of people enjoy poetry and you suggest (at least with my work) to use words that are very seldom used. Take the word transgression for example: doesn't it ruin the mood and flow of a poem if someone needs to stop reading to check the definition of 'transgression'? The first impression is always the greatest, is it not? I have friends who do prefer more simple words in poems so that they can relate to them and understand them. Some people read these poems out loud and have to stop because they may not know how to pronounce 'transgression'. There are even people who have a difficult time reading poems because of their eye sight.
We could keep this going as I'm sure we both have strong points to support both of our sides but is it really worth it? This thread is for Full_Metal to receive constructive critism and feedback for his work and shouldn't be hindered by the two of us going back and forth about preference. I do respect what you say though. :)
Log in to comment