MindfulHunters' forum posts
You say it as though that's a fact, yet it isn't.mgs4 hands down
halo his a good series but not as good has metal gear
vitonemesis
gears of war's story sucks, Halo 3 will hogtie gears in that field. But online, gears is much better. I think Halo online is the worst FPS ive ever played in terms of online.downPlayDemonAre you sure you aren't thinking the other way around? I found halo2 to have one of the BEST online experiences and formats EVER. Gears was mediocre and repetitive. No variation.
[QUOTE="MindfulHunters"][QUOTE="bloodlust_101"]If it comes 3/4ths of that It would still look amazing, JUST LIKE MOTORSTORM. And you didnt have to post the link 3 times kid... People see it, they will click it. That is.. IF they care about your argument... Limited textures? Here, lets compare between the 360 and the PS3. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v313/acason/OblivionPS3.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v313/acason/Oblivion360.jpg Ps3 is clearly superior. Now, if the 360 can do Gears of war, and the PS3 is proving better than the 360, then I dont see why it cant achieve similar graphics to the Killzone trailer.bloodlust_101
That's not very logical because they might be the same game but they are released at extremely different dates. This allows for the ps3 coding to be cleared up and for the possibility of improved textures. Doesn't mean 360 couldn't handle it, simply means it was rushed for 360 meanwhile they had extra time for ps3. What you should compare are two games that came out at the same time for both consoles.
That would only work if they started the 2 versions at the same time though... However, the PS3 version was canceled at one point in time, so development stopped. And, the PS3 is much harder to program for.. Comparing the same game, coming out at the same time would not always work, because most developers could care less about improving at times and just make them the exact same. At times but that's not necessarily true at this point. If the ps3 looks better, as many people claim in this thread, then obviuosly something was changed. So therefore you can't compare them and the differences unless you get the developer to clearly say, 360 can't handle the power.If it comes 3/4ths of that It would still look amazing, JUST LIKE MOTORSTORM. And you didnt have to post the link 3 times kid... People see it, they will click it. That is.. IF they care about your argument... Limited textures? Here, lets compare between the 360 and the PS3. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v313/acason/OblivionPS3.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v313/acason/Oblivion360.jpg Ps3 is clearly superior. Now, if the 360 can do Gears of war, and the PS3 is proving better than the 360, then I dont see why it cant achieve similar graphics to the Killzone trailer.bloodlust_101
That's not very logical because they might be the same game but they are released at extremely different dates. This allows for the ps3 coding to be cleared up and for the possibility of improved textures. Doesn't mean 360 couldn't handle it, simply means it was rushed for 360 meanwhile they had extra time for ps3. What you should compare are two games that came out at the same time for both consoles.
Log in to comment