im writting about the apparently new and improved E3. so far since the anouncement of its toning down there has been much in the way of complaining that there taking away such a great event. this is abuot the pros and cons of the new or possibly old E3. the old version was alot less crazy than the ones lately, they were basically press events with very little public turnout. now while many people will say that this new E3 is takin away E3 for them, these 50,000 people are the only ones who get to enjoy it. the purpose of E3 is to get as much information trailers and footage of games as possible. Games. Not japanese girls or dancers or flashy designs to grap peoples attention. we have to look at the purpose of E3, to get information to the consu,ers about games. that is at least the way i have always seen it. and what do these huge convention hall events bring? the masses, just enough ppl to jam up the event and make every journalists job that little bit harder. while this lets these 50000 ppl gt a better look at the games on show it isnt whats best for the public at large. personally as someone who has enjoyed the coverage of E3 and never been to it, i fell that if the journalists didnt have to ram through hordes of people they would get alot more done and show the world at much better look at everything.

Gamespot may stillbe crazyand i couldnt be happier but i want lots of crazy coverage, meaning i want lots of coverage and the crazyness is just a bonus but the coverage will always come first at such an important event.