Yeah, but that is with twice the memory in the 2900. The 2900 pretty much would blow the Crossfire out of the water if it had 1024Mb of memory available. Pay attention next time lucky :-P
Oh, also, in regards to XBOX 360 just playing shooters...snicker...chuckle chuckle....well, I guess Elder Scrolls IV is a shooter right? Again, I snicker.
Ahhhhhhh....whatever, I'll just enjoy laughing at my buddies trying to defeat co-op GOW right now haha...which is quite humorous since they seem to get screwed by the emergence holes every time :-D
7th Ronin, I am a PC gamer, and if there was a scent in the air of GOW, and Halo 3 coming to PC soon, I would be on that faster than a pack of wild dogs on a three-legged cat named tripod! I am, somewhat embarrassed for your comment...ha...haha. Also, to achieve the same level of graphics on the PC as the XBOX 360 for games like Call of Duty 2 and 3, or even like Crysis, you have to spend FARRRRRRRRRR FARR more than what you would pay for just an XBOX 360. PC gaming is far more expensive than console gaming.
ElmorePOW, I could care less about the meaningless XBOX vs. PS fanboys quabble, what I do notice however, is that the XBOX 360 has put out FAR FAR more games than the PS3, and SPARTAN has an excellent point in saying that Gamespot is only catering to the mass audience. The PS3 is a great console, with enormous potential, with crappy execution, atrocious pricing, and only a few decent (really only one good) game(s) so far. And what's more, is that the PS3 is in HUGE trouble because of games like Halo 3, GTA IV, Fable 2, Bioshock, the just anounced GOW 2, Mass Effect, and many other titles on the horizon, PS3 is going to have to come up with a miracle, a LITERAL miracle to recover sales being lost every day to the XBOX 360. Case and point, Sony is in a whole heap of trouble because they haven't released half decent/interesting games for the PS3.
MrBlake's comments