I brought mine for about the same reason I mean regardless of how people want to look at it.. most games that come out are gonna be on both ps3 and 360 so it really dosent matter it pretty much boils down to what you can afford and what appeals to you.. 360 has a good online setup and I wanted to play more of their exclusives the ps3, I mean I really didnt care too much for Metal gear I played it a few times dont get me wrong it is a good game but its not something I would get the system for...I dont have a fav console but I just feel I have more fun on the 360..

COD:WAW & GTA IV

I'll get them all

Not all DLC is on the disk some yes others no.. but IMO most of the small crap like what RE5 did just now with this release should have been included in the package...esp fo 60 bucks and dont get me started on the people who paid for the collectors edition.

[QUOTE="Dawq902"]well pretty muhc any good rated game that comes out has good graphics. MrPush

Nah thats not true... I would add Viking to the list as well that game was very underrated and it had beautiful graphics and animations...and combat system.

but got a low score, and some games like halo got a high score but I personally dont thing the graphics were amazing..compaired to some .. but I guess for its art style it was ok.

[QUOTE="_SOULtoSQUEEZE_"]graphics are really good, but the controls suck. the player moves way too sluggishgruoch1

I agree. Since they decided they wanted a 3rd person shooter instead of a survival horror, they should have added better 3rd person shooter controls. I wish I could walk or run while shooting. The game is basically Left 4 Dead with better graphics and story, except the characters move like tanks.