When did a 7.5 become a bad review? I really like the look of this game and will probably pick it up when I get paid again. I still believe that when a game has online multi-player there should be two scores given, one for campaign and one for multi-player with the average making up the final score.

This is a really good article. Nice one! My biggest gripe with the current review system is that I feel a lot games are receiving higher scores based on their online multiplayer. Personally I think games should have two scores: one for the campaign and one for multiplayer. This would give a better indication to players that have no interest in online gaming. For example Battlefield 3 scored an 8.5. I would say that the campaign was a 6.5 and the online a 9.0. I was very disappointed with the campaign, after all the footage I'd seen I was expecting big things and it really didn't live up to the hype.

Every rule has an exception. Today's rule was "First come, first served".

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

*For fans of The Who* Pin: "That deaf, dumb and blind kid sure plays a mean ball".

Sandra wished she'd paid more attention when applying for a "temping" job.

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

Only the bold survive but to survive you musn't be bowled.