NailedGR's forum posts

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

[QUOTE="Spike1988"][QUOTE="evildead6789"][ Trimmed evildead6789
Haha I chose my Asus motherboard because of reliability and a way better BIOS than a Gigabyte board. Also benchmarks showed that it performed better with overclocking than the nearest Gigabyte competitor. You see I actually RESEARCH before I buy parts and weigh up my best options. And I knew that this was gonna be a heavily overclocked rig. Can't emphasize enough how this isn't just a gaming rig and the extra RAM and SSD come in handy! Also the 6950 is more expensive than the 560 ti. Where I live it's anywhere from $20 - $50 more expensive for a 6950. Now if you're getting 2 like I plan to, that equates to $40 - $100 more for Crossfire 6950's than SLI 560 ti's. I also went with Nvidia because I believe their driver support is slightly better. But this is just personal preference. Oh and Skyrim and BF3 are Cpu intensive. Especially Skyrim. In fact look at these Benchmarks; http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/skyrim-performance-benchmark,review-32318-9.html It shows the difference of a stock i5 2500k vs one at 4ghz. It's a 10 - 15fps difference in Skyrim. Also based on my personal testing, there's about a 10fps difference in BF3 as well. So do some more research next time mate ;)

As for skyrim you seem to be right but not for bf 3 if the 6950 is more expensive in your country well i can't really argue with that besides that you're living in a country that has strange prices lol

6950s are more expensive in every country.

You know regarding this "you could have done this or that different", not everyone wants to completely rebuild their machine every single time they upgrade, also dropping in a new CPU doesn't require any effort. If he would have switched from AMD to intel he would have also had to reinstall windows.


So your suggestion costs 200 dollars more and requires an entire day of reinstalling everything on his computer vs 2 minutes to open the case, take out the old processor, put in new processor, close case, install done.

Your advice is bad, stop giving it.

EDIT: Furthermore, this wasn't a thread asking for advice, this guy upgraded and then wanted to share. Never at any point did he ask for your opinion and the fact that you are giving it is incredibly rude and disrespectful to the TC.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

you should have bought the i5-2500 or i5-2400, it's faster, whoops...evildead6789

You obviously didn't take into account that:

1)He had the motherboard

2)Your "solution" costs much more for `10% performance gain.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

[QUOTE="oldskooler79"]

Is it best to use VirtualBox or to Dual Boot? I already have 8 gigs of ram for Win 7 64-bit now so I'm thinking running XP 32-bit in VirtualBox should be no sweat? Even for light gaming?

digitalboy1990

The problem is that virtual box dosn't handle 3d games very well

except for the fact that games you'd need to vbox on aren't demanding at all.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

http://dfbrigade.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2448

BF3 outright refuses to run on a 2900XT whereas it runs just fine on a first generation 8800GTS. Both cards had similar performance. With AMD you need atleast a 3xxx series card to run BF3. Now yes the 8800 was a huge success and the 2900XT was a failure but still why doesnt AMD do something to support the game? There is no reason why the 2900XT cant when the 8800GTS can.

The ATI DX9 cards dont have official windows 7 support whereas nvidia DX9 cards do.

I am really not trying to be a fanboy here but it's just pretty obvious that nvidia has so much better legacy support. I cant imagine how pissed off I would be if my GTS 250 outright refused to run BF3.

For people who dont regularly upgrade it has to be said that nvidia seems the better option.

Gambler_3

I know several people with 8800s who are having a really hard time to get bf3 working properly.

also lol

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

[QUOTE="Tezcatlipoca666"]

This might help sales a little bit but AMD have really dropped the ball. They have put off a TON of potential buyers when they blew it with Bulldozer. I was planning on upgrading my Athlon II X2 to a bulldozer CPU but I bought a used Phenom II X4 955 with a Xigmatek (sp?) heatsink all for $80 from a classmate. Why would I spend money on a new mobo and then spend $150+ to get a Bulldozer CPU which hardly performs any better?

Some budget minded, new rig builders might show some interest in the FX-6100 at that price but I have doubts. The i5 SB family isn't all that much more expensive and offers better performance on average.

AMD needs to bring it. Intel keeps on turning up the heat and AMD is sitting around immobile. AMD won't die as a consequence of their current desktop CPU failure but it is going to hamper their ability to gain market share. Even if the Fusion chips are really great laptop APUs the image of failure and incompetence surrounding AMD right now is enough to make people ignore AMD based laptops entirely.

AMD, you need to do something in the next year or so. The Bulldozer architecture itself is innovative and has great potential but you need to iron out some of the issues. Refine it, optimize it, and then sell it at a highly competitve price.

/rant

hofuldig

I wouldnt buy an AMD laptop either. why? Because even though intels chips dont go over like 2.4GHz there still faster than AMD's laptop offerings. and i dont buy that whole APU thing either.

That doesn't make any sense. The a6 and a8s wipe the floor with the intel counterparts. they are by far the best laptops you can get without a discrete gpu.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Drop AA to 4x and see what happens.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

run chkdsk

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

I don't know what motherboard I have, but I have a dual core processor 2.8 ghzInternetSwag

Download speccy and run it and tell us everything it tells you.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Yeah guys Skyrim is really a great game, but so many threads about it it's sick. This is PC Gaming threads.. talk about L.A. Noire, Assassin's Creed: Revelations and Batman: Arkham City... jeez.

tjricardo089

But those are just console ports.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Windows 7 does have an option to run programs in "compatability" mode for Vista and XP. So for those particular games just right click- properties and then run in compatability mode of the platform.

SickStench

This is a big one.

Also you can download something like virtualbox and install the older operating systems on it. Currently on my vbox I am running ubuntu 11.04/11.10, windows XP/2000/98/95 (for nostalga's sake)