Yes my blog's title is correct, no typos, no grammar mistakes, no nothing. I haven't made my final rating but it seems that Black Ops might be better than Modern Warfare 2. You need reasons why right? So here they are:

Single Player: How Black Ops is better than MW2

- Better Story

- More Explosive (but no EMP in Washington D.C.)

- Longer (MW2 clocks in at around 5 1/2 hours while Black Ops is about 7-8 hours) - NOTE: Black Ops is better paced than Modern Warfare 2.

Single Player: What they both have

- Intense fights that might last for five minutes

- AI (Both enemy and friendly) can be a little . . . . stupid.

- An action film feel to the campaign

Single Player: What Black Ops has problems with that MW2 didn't

- The game came freeze up for a couple of seconds or completely in intense fights

Multiplayer: Modern Warfare 2

- F***ing fun game modes

- Dual Weilding Shotguns (some overpowering) , Grenade Launchers (Noob tubes), One Man Army, Commando

- Killstreaks (Maxinum # = 25 - a Nuke)

- Basically everything else not mentioned was in MW

- Co-op = extra fun

- Prestige Mode

Multiplayer: Black Ops

- Wager Matches = a lot of fun

- NO MORE DUAL WEILDING SHOTGUNS, ONE MAN ARMY, COMMANDO, and grenade launchers don't count for killstreaks

- A Currency Mode that is fantastic. You get money for winning matches, getting kills, doing challenges, contracts (that change everyday)

- Killstreaks brought down to 11 - NO MORE NUKES!

- (Co-op) Zombie Mode - Can play as JFK if you want :)

- Shotguns are not overpowered at all

- Prestige Mode

And that's MOST of the content I can come up with. Don't get me wrong, I love MW2 as much as the next person but Black Ops feels so good. And after the disappointment of World at War, it is safe to say that Treyarch's game will be in my Game of the Year list. It is a true contender to Mass Effect 2, Red Dead: Redemption, Super Mario Galaxy 2, and Halo: Reach. Look for my review sometime next week.