It might be difficult but it was an Assassin's Creed 1 & 2 Montage. It had excellent editing. It also had top-notch transitions like an AC 1 leap of faith transitioning into an AC 2 one. 2009/2010. It was on the front page of the Gaming section on YouTube if anyone came by it.

Thanks in advance if anyone can find it.

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

[QUOTE="Nokitch"] Pretty sure . Just one thing . It's basically a miscalculation or something you overlooked while reading it .Buttons1990

The problem is that the 9$ part doesn't make any sense. If you had 25 add 3 and 2 two you have 30. Did you just sort of twist the wording/math to make it 29?

That is the point of the riddle, the it is worded to make you think "3 x 9 = 27 + the 2 the bellhop has = 29"... The wording makes you think the $2 is added on afterwards, but the $2 was already part of the 3 x 9 to begin with...

[QUOTE="Nokitch"][QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

1. But you are reducing the price from the original when they don't have to pay the full 10 dollars, rather 9 dollars. The 9 dollars doesn't work with the original 30$ because they didn't get a discount in the original pricing. Am I missing something?

SgtKevali

The problem is that the 9$ part doesn't make any sense. If you had 25 add 3 and 2 two you have 30. Did you just sort of twist the wording/math to make it 29?

[QUOTE="Nokitch"][QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

1. It doesn't equal 30 because you're not looking for the original price if you're deducting from the amount they have to pay theoretically.

2. If the question is who shot the pistol, the answer is the man, who else would it be?

3. Nothingness can't be described if that's your question. Language lacks that ability. Language describes what is.

SgtKevali

1. But you are reducing the price from the original when they don't have to pay the full 10 dollars, rather 9 dollars. The 9 dollars doesn't work with the original 30$ because they didn't get a discount in the original pricing. Am I missing something?

[QUOTE="GHlegend77"][QUOTE="Dman0017"] Yet you never do give out those GHbucks :xDman0017

1. It doesn't equal 30 because you're not looking for the original price if you're deducting from the amount they have to pay theoretically.

2. If the question is who shot the pistol, the answer is the man, who else would it be?

3. Nothingness can't be described if that's your question. Language lacks that ability. Language describes what is.

SgtKevali

[QUOTE="Nokitch"]

Well my friend asked me these two riddles , and I found the answer of one of them while the other one , I kept annoying him to tell me . So now I wonder if the people of Off-Topic can solve them , which I'm pretty sure because I'm just plain stupid .

Riddle 1 :

There are 3 guys that go into a hotel and decide to stay a single night in there . The receptionist says it is $30 total for all of them to stay for one night . So each person pays $10 . ($10 x 3 = $30) The guys get the keys and leave . A couple minutes later , the receptionist made a mistake and found out that the initial cost is actually $25 . So the receptionist calls the bellboy and gives him $5 and divide it evenly to give it back to the customers . ($30 - $5 = $25) The bellboy doesn't know how to divide $5 by 3 so instead he decides to give each customer a loonie and keep the other two dollars for himself . ($5 - $3 = $2)

So now the original cost of the room was $10 for each person . ($10 x 3 = $30) Now since the bellboy gave back $3 the new price that each person should pay should now be $9 since they each got a dollar back . ($9 x 3 = $27) Now the bellboy has an extra $2 with him that he didn't give back . ($27 + 2 = $29) How come the number doesn't equal $30 ?

I think I explained this riddle fair enough . If you think there might be an error , just tell me and I'll see if it is one . I just can't believe I never knew the answer when it's right in front of me .

Riddle 2 :

There is this man and he created a portal that can go back in time 1 minute . That person goes in front of the portal and starts assembling a pistol . Once he is done assembling the pistol , he looks through the portal and see's himself still assembling the pistol . He shoots the gun and the bullet passes through the portal and kills himself in the past and also killing himself instantly in the present . Now , who shot the pistol ? How could he have shot himself in the present through the portal , while he is still assembling the pistol . If that did happen , if he was assembling the pistol in the present time , wouldn't he be shot by his future self through the portal ? But if that did happen , how did his future self finish assembling the pistol and shoot himself in the past ?

The answer in this riddle is actually easy . Just took me a couple hours but might take you a couple minutes . I'm just not that smart .

But there is one riddle my friend also asked me and I got stumped by it .

Riddle 3 :

If there were no colours in the world , including black and white , what would we see ? We wouldn't see anything right , because there is no colour . So basically we would see white or black , but that's a colour , so then what would we see ? Nothing ? But can you describe nothing and tell us what we would see in nothing ?

Well that's all I got . Now get to it Off-Topic !

Buttons1990

Riddle 1:

It wouldn't be 27 + 2... The 2 is already added into the price... Each man got 1 dollar back making the entire cost 27... 25 for the room and 2 for the bellboy...

Riddle 2:

I don't know, because the bullet that killed him whether the gun was built or not was there the whole time?

Riddle 3:

Black and white are not colors... We would see black, as black is a total absence of all colors (similar to how white is a combination of all colors on the spectrum)...

1.$30 (initial payment) = $25 (to clerk) + $2 (to bellhop) +$3 (refund)

jessmaster13

Well my friend asked me these two riddles , and I found the answer of one of them while the other one , I kept annoying him to tell me . So now I wonder if the people of Off-Topic can solve them , which I'm pretty sure because I'm just plain stupid .

Riddle 1 :

There are 3 guys that go into a hotel and decide to stay a single night in there . The receptionist says it is $30 total for all of them to stay for one night . So each person pays $10 . ($10 x 3 = $30) The guys get the keys and leave . A couple minutes later , the receptionist made a mistake and found out that the initial cost is actually $25 . So the receptionist calls the bellboy and gives him $5 and divide it evenly to give it back to the customers . ($30 - $5 = $25) The bellboy doesn't know how to divide $5 by 3 so instead he decides to give each customer a loonie and keep the other two dollars for himself . ($5 - $3 = $2)

So now the original cost of the room was $10 for each person . ($10 x 3 = $30) Now since the bellboy gave back $3 the new price that each person should pay should now be $9 since they each got a dollar back . ($9 x 3 = $27) Now the bellboy has an extra $2 with him that he didn't give back . ($27 + 2 = $29) How come the number doesn't equal $30 ?

I think I explained this riddle fair enough . If you think there might be an error , just tell me and I'll see if it is one . I just can't believe I never knew the answer when it's right in front of me .

Riddle 2 :

There is this man and he created a portal that can go back in time 1 minute . That person goes in front of the portal and starts assembling a pistol . Once he is done assembling the pistol , he looks through the portal and see's himself still assembling the pistol . He shoots the gun and the bullet passes through the portal and kills himself in the past and also killing himself instantly in the present .

Edit :Now , how did he kill himself in the past? How could he have shot himself in the present through the portal , while he is still assembling the pistol . If that did happen , if he was assembling the pistol in the present time , wouldn't he be shot by his future self through the portal ? But if that did happen , how did his future self finish assembling the pistol and shoot himself in the past ?

The answer in this riddle is actually easy . Just took me a couple hours but might take you a couple minutes . I'm just not that smart .

But there is one riddle my friend also asked me and I got stumped by it .

Riddle 3 :

If there were no colours in the world , including black and white , what would we see ? EDIT :Let's just say that black and white is now a colour , even though it's not . I know that , we all know that . But let's just say that black and white is a colour in this riddle .

We wouldn't see anything right , because there is no colour . So basically we would see white or black , but that's a colour , so then what would we see ? Nothing ? But can you describe nothing and tell us what we would see in nothing ?

Well that's all I got . Now get to it Off-Topic !