I think everyone posting here is losing the big idea of what a review is...

The review is not a fact that this game is a 6.5 and should be taken that way by everyone. If I had listened to every review that GS had posted in the past I would have missed out on playing a lot of fun games and probably wouldn't own half the games in my collection.

That being said, a review should be taken like a movie review from a movie critic that you can either choose to believe or not to believe. I, personally, bought AO2 and think its great from the co-op story to the 2 player splitscreen multiplayer (something that is not available for other games on PS3). So this review doesn't affect me in any other way. Judging from most of the posts here, it seems that everyone thinks reviews are unbiased from GS. Look through all of the reviews here and someone please show me a PS3 original game that was not ported to 360 that is a 9.0 or higher. Halo 3, which is basically a polished Halo 2, (don't wanna start a fanboy war here) got a better score than R:FoM where Resistance was a new original title with great multiplayer. This being said, try to take the facts out of the review when reading one instead of listening to the opinions of the writer.