If you got at least four friend that also have l4d2 or are willing to get it, I would say go with l4d2. If not but you still want a robust multiplayer FPS go with MW2, else Batman.
LoZ: OoT was the first Zelda Game I really played and beat, then I went back and beat the rest. So, for me OoT takes the cake. However, if I started with Link to the Past that probably would have been my favorite. I also really enjoyed Majora's Mask.
Lol, yeah I don't have a good feeling about this game. Hopefully this is just screens from an early build and some of those horrible looking units either get scrapped or change drastically. I am also not a fan of the MASSIVE mobile bases if you will.
I hope EALA fails as hard as they did with RA3 and have to close down because they have totally destroyed the latest C&C games IMO. Time will tell sooner or later time will tell i guess. Who knows maybe this game will actually turn out half decent but I won't be holding my breadth.
Maybe Valve is struggling in time of recession and needs the monies. Any way yeah from the sounds of it L4D2 should be $49.99 and L4D1 should have been $29.99.
I never understood why Sony decided to do a joint venture with IBM and Toshiba to create the Cell processor. Granted its great for somethings but not worth investing in and slapping into a console for games. Consoles should just go with a decent high end x86 processor so the devs can start pumping out high quality games and not have to spent countless years mastering a new piece of hardware like the KZ2 devs granted they did a beauty with it.
I am not saying we shouldn't advance technology, I am just saying a console isn't probably the best place to start implimenting it; however, putting a blu ray player in the PS3 probably helped sell more units in the long run.
Plus, there are now talks that the next consoles could be running on a GPU only with talks of the next nvidia GPGPU and CUDA programming. So there would be no point for the Cell if that happens. Idk, just my thoughts.
Log in to comment