There's something up about the ratings system. Games that I would think would qualify for a 'Superb' rating are getting demoted to 'Great', despite the fact that they are every bit as good as Superb-rated games. My cases in point for this argumnt are The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princes and Metroid Prime 3: Corruption. In both cases, the major reason cited by the GameSpot reviewer for their downgrade is their fundamental similarity with previous games in their franchise.
So what do we have going on here? Is this a novelty bias? Can only new franchises, or massive changes to existing franchises hope to get a Superb rating? Is there a developing bias against Nintendo? Is a certain, Seattle-based software company not-so-subtly influencing game reviews with financial support for the site? In any case, Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition seemed to buck the trend, but that's beside the point. Let's get back to the two games in question.
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess was graded down because it was said to resemble it's 10-year old predecessor, The Legend of Zelda: The Ocarina of Time 'too much'. Firstly, let's take a look at this game Twilight Princess is said to resemble. Ocarina of Time is, admitted by GameSpot, the first game the site ever gave a 'Perfect' rating to. On top of that, it was recognized by many gaming sites and magazines as being the best game ever made, and by many more as at least being in hte top 3 in that category. Alright, so let's go back to Twilight Princess. Its graphics are better than Ocarina. Its gameplay is an improvement. In short, in virtually every way, it is an improvement on the model that Ocarina represents. There is only one real issue. Ocarina of Time was the first Zelda game to make the leap into 3D. That's a leap that can't be made again. Game makers can't add another dimension any more, they've run out. So Twilight Princess ends up getting labeled 'another 3D Zelda game'. Does this mean it's not a Superb game? Maybe it's not perfect, but do you get knocked down from Superb by resembling THE GREATEST GAME EVER MADE?! It seems a bit rediculous to me.
Now, it's happened again with Metroid Prime 3: Corruption. It has been knocked down to Great status from Superb because it bears a resemblance to its predecessors: Metroid Prime and Metroid Prime 2: Echoes. Mind you, it is duely upgraded for its new system, including more voice acting, better graphics and, most notably, a significantly upgraded control scheme, which GameSpot themselves said set the standard for FPS-style games on the Wii. So this is to say that it is everything its predecessors are, but better. Now looking back, Metroid Prime was given a strong Superb rating, and an Editor's Choice award. It easily ranks among the top games ever made for the GameCube. Metroid Prime 2: Echoes was given a somewhat weaker Superb rating, though the review states that it was everything Metroid Prime was, and more, but it seems that was somehow already becoming a bad thing. Once again, I have to ask:if Metroid Prime was a Superb game, and Metroid Prime 2 was a Superb game, and Metroid Prime 3 is not only just as good, but better.... how can it not be a Superb game? How is that possible?
I'm not going to nit-pick over tenths of a point, but these are major categories, and the fact is, when you're comparing games, 'Great' is still a disappointment, and I think the fact that games of the quality of Twilight Princess and Metroid Prime 3 were given this rating, with such poor rationale, demonstrates clearly that there is something deeply wrong with the rating system here.
Log in to comment