The textures are the most important thing in the graphics. Then comes the special effects, particle effectsand lightingand sure the framerate has to be solid, but that's really a different thing. Some ppl say that cod4 has beautiful graphics and that's BS if you're saying thatit has amazing graphics on thePS3 version (tho, CoD4 isn't graphically so magnificent anyway). The textures of the ps3 version are terrible, I know that since I only have aPS3 and Cod4 on it.

Halo 3 has good graphics! No doubt about it.Good textures and nice 60fps framerate. I know that too, since I swapped my PS3 and my friends 360 for a week when the Halo 3 came out. Gears of war has great graphics too, but I'm not really counting that, because theengine ads some seriousdetail into everysurface so it's kinda cheating and it looks stupid that every obstacle looks the same when looking up close.

Killzone 2 is the game that I'm looking forward to for the graphics. But I still doubt it'll reach the level of Crysis which has the best graphics I've ever seen. But now I think Ratchet and Clank has the best graphics on consoles... Seriously!

WTF? UT3 ain´t coming in september dude. It´s coming in november! And this is a stupid question, because warhawk doesn´t really cost much and UT3 is coming a couple of moths later so you should buy them both.

At least that´s my plan! 8)

I don´t REALLY see any reasons to buy the 80gig version. I mean, u can buy even aa bigger HDD with less than 100$. And thare´s the Motorstorm... Yeah it´s kinda worth of playing, but it pretty much sucks a big time after u´ve played it thru. So 60 gig, and u can buy some GOOD games with the 100$.