First let start with good news....we don't care how Sony spins it, $500 to $600 for a videogame console is awful. It cost kind of too much. Also, it's not that there weren't fun games, it's that they didn't play any differently than a long list of similar titles on PS2. And the graphics-while every goodin most cases-didn't show any overwhelming  "PS3 difference" to justify the system costing $200 more than Xbox 360:evil:

NOw it's time for a good news!!:lol:Let start with this...PS3 has a lot more going for it than against it. If it's not because of the price, people would surely focus a lot more on the console's cool aspects.Hard drive in PS3: which will make load times much faster;Warhawk streamed data from both the hard drive and game disc simultaneously, and went from the title screen to in-game action in just six seconds. Plus having a hard drive will be crucial to taking advantage of Sony's robust online plans for downloadable content. As a side note since the hard drive will provide plenty of space for game saves, you won't be forced to shell out for any kind of memory cards.

PS3's features(that Xbox360 don't have): 360 doesn't have a hard drive option bigger than 20GB, there's no built-in-wi-fi, no HDMI port, no card reader slots, it isn't capable of 1080p, its games come on comparatively tiny DVDs, and there's no built-in HD movie playback. PS3 package includes wireless controllers, which the 360's Core pack doesn't, so while it's questionable whether Sony should attempt to sell A $500 or $600 console, at least the extra money does get you some potentially cool extras.