Pro-Gear-Spec's forum posts

Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

I can assure you that Skyrim is far from unplayable. Maybe on consoles but on PC the bugs and glitches are far from game breaking and the immersion overcomes all the little problems. Also on PC the bugs are vastly exaggerated as I didn't come across any until like 30 hours in. And they were only tiny ones.

It's weird how the game is very different for everyone

seanmcloughlin

That's the wors part...no, not the PC part, i'm aware that the PC seems to be having far less problems that the console versions, IMO the worst part is that it seems so random, i mean the amount of people having or not having any issues with the game in the console versions seems to be completely random, a week ago, the PS3 version was filled with bugs and glitches and stuff...this week, reports indicate that the 360 version is suffering from the same issues...and yet, there are people who haven't had any sort of problems...WTH is going on???

Very poorly written game code. The PC version didn't even use 4 GB of RAM for gods sake. Bethesda are just really bad at writing game code. That's why its completely random

Now if those **** actually listened to me when I said they should hire or pay us to do beta testing when i used to work with them this wouldn't be a problem. This time it may affect people buying the elderscrolls seris in general.
Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts

First of all, their games sucks. They make annual games that are not on par with other triple A games. They arederivative formulaic games that have no personality whatsoever. Their games have this pseudo obsession with guns with poor puzzle/platforming/level design mechanics. Their games are flawed and they never fix them. So, I wonder why are they considered a top-tier developer if they can't get fundamentals like gameplay correct? Am I missing something about their games that is causing me to stop playing them?

nhh18
Because of Spyro and the PS2 Ratchet games (Scartching secert agent calnk and Size matters) In fact, the only time they did better than Naughty dogg was the PS2 Ratchet games. (Before SAC and SM) After Deadlocked your theory starts becoming more relevant.
Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts

I don't know if the rating scale is just insanely flawed, or if gamers are just insanely lucky to have reviewers telling them how crappy a game is when the worst games so many have played are in the 7 zone.

Personally, I thought DNF was meh, but I enjoyed it. At 3.5 its the lowest scored game I've ever liked, and probably ever played (though the reviews were "averagely mediocre" most other palces at 6's and 5's). It was cheap fun, just classic old school gaming that didn't age well, but managed to have semi modern graphics.

I also loved Alpha Protocol despite its mediocre reception, its the perfect showcase of Obsidian's strengths and flaws (except for maybe Mew Vegas). Its got all the great RPG features and meaningful choices and interactions and fun skill building, but no polish, no balance, and despite a decent story and writing, Obsidian probably should have hired some more enthusiastic voice actors (like they did with New Vegas).

SPYDER0416
Alpha Protocl had no polish, and no balance? You're going to have to expalin that in massive detail..... To survive...
Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts

[QUOTE="Demonjoe93"]

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

mediocrity and outdated formula ...

with better graphics.

HaloPimp978

Ocarina of Time:97 on GameRankings

Wind Waker: 94

Twilight Princess (Wii): 94

Ocarina of time 3D: 94

Skyward Sword: 93

Majora's Mask: 91

Link to the Past (GBA): 91

You mad?

Seems like he is nothing but a hater, you got the facts and well he has nothing but being a troll.

Lol, using gamerakings is diggin for desperationg.
Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts

Yes, the Jaugar is the best console of all times and that's an undeniable fact. What's new? :P

nameless12345
You make a strong case, but the lack of games says no. Unless you include the CD add-on in which case: You make a strong case, and the games (some) are very good, but uh, lack of games still says no. Good games, not enough of them to play.
Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts

ps1 had no fans it was noisy because of the cd-rom drive.

heeeeeeeeeweeee
Is that why the N64 was comparable to the Saturn in sales? Because it had a fnabse. Lol. Btw, Hucards are better than carts. Fact.
Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts

[QUOTE="sts106mat"] from now on your name is "Tormy" ok. but that is defo the same set up as eltormo.tormentos

Set up you mean the same TV.? What brand is that TV.?

Stop calling me eltormo,that dude got here basically in 2010,i am a member of this site probably before you were,i joined this place on 2003,and Tormy is how some people use to call me on other forums,where i use to post mate.

Know the exact time zeltormo joins. Judging from his point count-to-level ratio, I am betting he also got modded a hell of a lot for making stuff up. Confirmed: Uncontrolable Sony Bias, take ritalin. :)
Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts

[QUOTE="Masenkoe"]

[QUOTE="heeeeeeeeeweeee"]

It's completely silent cartridge>>>stupid cd's.

HavocV3

>cartidge

What is this the 20th century? Discs have always been superior. It's not the disc that's loud it's the drive that it's in.

Nice job OP, 1/10 for effort

how are discs superior?:?

pricing is really the only reason they were dropped in favor of discs. cartridges/flash memory are MUCH better than discs in about every other respect.

Where else can you get draw distances, texture pop-in, extenede media, DLC, and unlocking DLC already on the cd? Carts can't do that.
Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts
Zelda will always be a consistently good franchise. Skyward Sword proves Nintendo has plenty of fresh ideas left. We all know McShea's review was an incoherent, rambling mess, and that SS pushes the defining characteristics of the series to its limits. More than Zelda it's the Mario games I'm worried about. 3D Land wasn't all that great, and I don't know how they can hope to top Galaxy 2. As Yahtzee said in his review of Galaxy 1, where does Mario go from here?princeofshapeir
Instead of throwing useless words, how about you describe these imaginary limits and characteristics it defined, how it shows they have fresh ideas and how it's consistently good. Which strangely enough, the split fanbase factually disagrees with you.
Avatar image for Pro-Gear-Spec
Pro-Gear-Spec

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Pro-Gear-Spec
Member since 2011 • 50 Posts

[QUOTE="Pro-Gear-Spec"][QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]

Uh, yes, yes there was. Maybe YOU weren't particularly impressed, but the game wowed millions of gamers and all the critics at the time. There was nothing else like it before. For most gamers it was an unbelievable jump. That is why the game is still given so much unwarranted worship and put up on a pedestal today. That is why it is still the highest scoring game of all time to this day.

Feel free to live in some wacky fantasy world, but whether or not you impressed by the game at the time has absolutely no bearing on the way the game was received as a whole.

Wiimotefan

I could say the same thing for MGS4 and and GTAIV but I bet that doesn't count though. let's be honest, wowed millions of gamers? You mean the small amount that actually played the game? You eman the fact that the series sells lees and less every single time that one game is rereleased even fans of the game don't rebuy it? Critics? I don't know whether they were paid off or any other excuse but there was nothing amzaing about the game to the levels you were implying. it did nothing impressive that didn't stop it from being shoved off rather quickly. Now now, before your fanboy instincts attack me, because they will, realize something: 1. Not many people played the game 2. Not that many people who did was interested in the game 3. Reasons 2 and 3 question these critics. 4. A lot of these critics don't bring up the game much anymore but GS and IGn have for many times. 5. The Zelda fanbase is split in many diffren pieces and flavors. 6. Quite a few LTTP fans did not like the game 7. It barely helped the N64, but I know it barely if at all moved any consoles. Notice I have not talked about the actual game. Just pointed that out. I am saying it's not impressive and it never was and that' the truth despite what oter peoples opinion you think are better than yours say. However, I never actually talked about the game. So hold that fanboy in you for now.

Let me cut through your nonsensical bullsh*t here for a sec. How am I a fanboy? Did you not even read my first post? I think its absurd the amount of praise the game gets. My point was that while OoT was fantastic at the time, it really isn't worthy of much praise these days.

IMO the Zelda series goes like this.

SS > MM = WW > TP > LttP > OoT > LoZ > Zelda 2.

Not exactly what I would call an OoT fanboy.

Just because you're some 90s kid that was too young to remember the shockwaves OoT sent through the industry doesn't mean it didn't happen. Try again son.

You just fail in even trying to counter and argument you just lost. You also did imply fanboyism all over the place. I also would like to know what I posted had anything to do with saying it didn't send shockwaves through the industry, and technically, and honestly, it barely did so it just adds to your stupidity even more. Your overrating a game you said is overrated and doesn't deserve this much praise? Ha. Many people don;t even now the game exists more now then they did before. Also the fail at calling me a 90's kid when in fact, uh, the game came out in the 90's. So now I have to wonder if you started gaming recently.. Especially when you're implying you consider critics to have a better opinion of your own and blindly follow.