Good grief. Does nobody think at all? *Obviously* a lot of those images looked better on the 360 than on the PS3. They post it right there for everybody to see. It's a graphics comparison. That's all. They're comparing one game developed for two platforms, and in most cases the 360 looked better. What they can't tell you is how much time and effort the developers may have put into "converting" some of those games from the 360 to the PS3, or trying to learn the finer aspects of the Cell Processor (which is *required* for better graphics), or things like that. In other words: all this shows is that the 360's games released in the past year had slightly better graphics than the PS3's games. However, it does not say anything about the hardware of each console (which one is more powerful, for example). You can't draw any conclusions from these screenshots at all, except that a lot of these games looked better on the 360 than the PS3. Any other assumptions or conclusions based solely off of these images is a complete and utter logical fallacy. Stop being idiots. You make my brain hurt.