Pyro_Shrapnel's forum posts

Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts
Erm, the gt isnt that much faster then the gts, there is nothing wrong. It only drops down to 20 in rare cases.
Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts

hmmmm.....maybe ur right.

Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts
What about it mate?
Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts
d00d, Ram will not make crysis run at a higer frame rate. my friend has the same rig but with a gts, i put my gt in there when i got it ( i didnt have my cpu yet) and it ran the same as with mine. BTW its in DX9 mode.
Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts
Yup, i had to buy an os for my GF so i gave her my XP and got vista premium, no point in buying XP now, IMO Vista>XP...i have had quite a few problems with compatibility ect but that should all be ironed out soon.
Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts

I just got my new zotac 8800gt with crysis, I run it at 1650x150, No AA on Medium settings (doesnt look as good as console games like this) with a bad framerate. The FPS hovers around 35 and can go as low as 20, I consider this fps unplayable as it feels like crap and I am unable aim smoothly.

I am a PC gamer and i do enjoy PC gaming more then console gaming but I just want it to be known that Crysis does indeed look far better then xbox 360 games (only console ive played of this gen) on high settings, which i tried albiet with bad fps. However even with high-end, expensive hardware crysis does not look better then halo 3 on medium settings.

P.S: I do not like Halo 3's gameplay but the graphics in non split screen mode are quite good.

P.S 2: Bioshock, Oblivion and Orange Box do look and better on my PC then on 360 but at a higher cost

P:S 3: I am not trying to attack console gaming ( I do enjoy aspects of it and did own an Xbox and PS2) I just want the truth known, I am dissapointed with Crysis which doesnt look that good on medium settings and is just another shooter, I am sick of the same thing over and over again, I hated COD 4 for this reason too.

A q6600, 2GB ram and an 8800gt is a powerful, costly machie and i expect it to max out the latest and greatest.

Here is proof that i do run crysis on my specified hardware:

Proof

Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts
Red XII produces the kind of argument i can accept, even if i dont agree with he's conclusion.
Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts

EXACTLY! thank you lonewolf.

Ali is bigger so he must be better, quite correct. Both are good fighters but Ali wins because he is physically bigger.

Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts

You guys just arent getting it........both are good fighters but Ali is the clear victor. We are talking about a streetfight here between a lightweight and a heavyweight. WTF do you think is going to happen? How hard do you think it is to land One...single....punch!?!?? Not very.

Dont give me this "No wai nobody can hit Bruce Lee coz hes liek a moovie star and stuff, held just bicycle kick ali in da face!"

It is physically impossible to avoid Ali calibre punches for the duration of a fight.

Dont be stupid children, espeically in the tighter confines of a bar or even "the street", Ali wins by stunning knockout from a monster punch. In a real street fight only basic instincts are used.....Lee isnt going to be able to do any complex moves for at least teh first second of the fight. Unfortunatley this is all Ali would need.

Avatar image for Pyro_Shrapnel
Pyro_Shrapnel

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Pyro_Shrapnel
Member since 2005 • 82 Posts

bruce lee he a freaking machine he is a martial arts legend and he was trained in western boxing and won the 1958 boxing championchip against 3 time champ Gary Elms by knockout on the third round. bruce lee is skilled in both boxing and matrial arts. so bruce lee all the way

qoute: bruce lee, "To tell the truth....I could beat anyone in the world.

igotbeef

Wow you can quote a wikipedia page, you have brought nothing new to the argument.

I already said that lee was a boxing champion, this doesnt change the fact that Ali is bigger and thus can take/do more damage.

Ali has been there.....ali has been on the verge of defeat, ali has been knocked down and gotten back up, ali was heavy weight champion of the world more then once whereas Lee beat a washed up Elms in an AMATUER championship. Its possible to win an Amatuer championship with 2 fights.

Your including quotes from Bruce Lee? the man has nothing on Ali's smack talking skills. The difference is, when Ali claims he is the greatest....hes right.

qoute: bruce lee, "To tell the truth....I could beat anyone in the world.