I wouldnt call the original translation work better or worse because being more literal means that the Netflix version is probably more accurate even if some stuff sounds strange.
I wonder if they intend to make a low budget version as well as they did with introducing 2ds, maybe handheld only or TV only.
I wouldn't buy another switch just because they make a new one and if by chance they make any game for the switch 2.0 that doesn't run on my current switch I'll stop buying Nintendo products altogether.
@tsunami2311: while it doesn't bother me I'd definitely turn it off given the option. I think it was meant to work with the camera but I don't know any game that uses it
@pjosephson: such passion, that's nice. Hey you could 100% right, maybe Sony never wanted it but only Microsoft's response was known, heck maybe they were asked first and the idea was shut down.
None of that matters to what I'm saying which is.
The consoles already have high numbers of users and large online communities making this err "nice to have feature" unnecessary.
So all it's doing is making Sony look like badguys. Whether these communities are United or not, a multiplayer game that fails to keep interest will phase out.
I'm not sure how large the switch online community is though, haven't tried their online multiplayer games.
@pjosephson: wow all I said was maybe and this is your response? Maybe doesn't mean I'm sure or anything other well you know, maybe. Seems to me that you're just an overreacting idiot, oh well.
I keep claiming these games even though I'm never really interested or already own them like those PS3 games I didn't even know exist like that bound by flame..... I guess that's what the word "free" does
@neoistheone: oh so you're saying that Sony made Microsoft look bad in the past but now that it's the other way around it's not Microsoft doing the same? Ok great logic, I get you.
RJS86's comments