Right. Again, microsoft have a ton of exclusives. The 360 console has few console specific exclusives of note but it will share many great microsoft exclusives ( games like X COM come to mind). So if we're measuring the value of the 360 on what games it will be getting, then it has the highest value come generation's end as it will be getting tons of games. I think it is criminal for a any non PC gamer to miss out on the 360 because of fanboyism, if you don't have a great gaming PC a 360 is a must.
RRJaden's forum posts
I meant to say, microsoft has two platforms and their 360 console is getting more games than the other consoles.
So when people talk about microsoft not producing games, I hope they realize microsoft aren't worried about console exclusives as they'll share a lot of games with the PC. They know their console is offering way more games in the end.
[QUOTE="RRJaden"]
[QUOTE="kungfuchaos"]Whats more sad is people who come on here day after day after day after day after day after day whining about exclusivity one way or the other. I can honestly count the number of "exclusive" games that I have played since 2005 on both my hands...maybe!!! I just dont understand why it is so important for some of you to have exclusive games. Is it for bragging rights? If it is, GROW UP!!! Is it out of fear that a particular console will lose sales or go out of business? If it is, get a new hobby!!! Seriously, this exclusive talk is lame and makes all of those who talk about it each and every day look a little insecure.
ultraking
So true, the number of worthy exclusives on both platform are so few in number, this gen is mostly about mulit plat games. The only AAA exclusive titles this gen have been Halo 3, the two Gears Games, Uncharted 2 (Mass Effect but that's changed) , Gow 3 and... some inconsequential racing titles. It's not been a great time for exclusives.
you forgot some gamesYeah I know but exclusives aren't as big of a deal this gen, at least with regards to the really hyped games. All in all, I hope people realize the 360 has a distinct advantage in comparison to the other consoles (Not platforms but consoles, nintendo's and sony's).
There are going to be a ton of microsoft exclusives that go under the radar i.e. multiplatform games exclusive to the 360 consoles (which means PC and 360). So if it's an issue of interesting titles coming out on one console and not the others, 360 would win on sheer numbers.
Whats more sad is people who come on here day after day after day after day after day after day whining about exclusivity one way or the other. I can honestly count the number of "exclusive" games that I have played since 2005 on both my hands...maybe!!! I just dont understand why it is so important for some of you to have exclusive games. Is it for bragging rights? If it is, GROW UP!!! Is it out of fear that a particular console will lose sales or go out of business? If it is, get a new hobby!!! Seriously, this exclusive talk is lame and makes all of those who talk about it each and every day look a little insecure.[QUOTE="1Stark1"]
its seems 360 fans have nothing to talk about or hype besides minscule multiplat differences. Some of these multiplats they use for ownage look better on PS3. Its quite sad really that people will grasp at any straw given to them. Anyway, do you guys think MS will announce anything at E3 that will release THIS year.
kungfuchaos
So true, the number of worthy exclusives on both platform are so few in number, this gen is mostly about mulit plat games. The only AAA exclusive titles this gen have been Halo 3, the two Gears Games, Uncharted 2 (Mass Effect but that's changed) , Gow 3 and... some inconsequential racing titles. It's not been a great time for exclusives.
Killzone has a very very weak premise for a intergalactic war game.
What Zelda needs is a better mythos. But if I was handling the Zelda franchise I would make it more gritty, by having Link fight more humanoid enemies, like enemy soldiers instead comical little monsters. I would also have Link's armor and attire look more and more tattered and beaten, to emphasize that he's in life and death fights and not kiddy bloodless fights.
The whole universe needs better back story. What is the actual geography of the world of Hyrule? There should be rival kingdoms, Hylian noble men (some good and others bad).
There should be competent Hylian knights and warriors with their own heroic deeds. Link should actually have allies comprised of Hylian knights who help him out. Link should actually be a trained warrior. Zelda needs to have more to do, like TWW and OOT tried to do. Ganondorf should not appear again, until after several games, his presence just margnializes the urgency of the crisis in every story he's been in since after OOT.
Ganondorf was great in OOT, he had his chance for glory and now should be eliminated (he was pointless in TWW and TP), now give us more villains.
Log in to comment