@TJSpyke: When they say that a GPU "supports" 4K they don't mean that it actually renders anything 4K: they just mean that the GPU won't prevent a game from outputting at that resolution. So, for instance, the original PS4 totally had the power to run tetris in 4K. But you couldn't develop a 4K tetris game for it because it just wouldn't output at that resolution. (The makers of Trine actually complained about this. They said they could get their game to run at 4k/30FPS but Sony's hardware just didn't allow it).

So, while in almost every case, the PS4 Pro upscales to 4K, it nonetheless supports 4K because you could get it to output native 4K for an undemanding game.

@djbut: "supports external hard drive storage."

@desert_thief: Try to win NEW fans. As load as fanboys are, most gamers are willing to switch the brand they purchase from, but Nintendo's done almost nothing to excite those who's reaction to "new nintendo console" is "meh."

@wretch1d: Yeah, basically.

@tracerxxi: Did the N64 become some kind of shining success when I wasn't looking?

@titang1: If we're going to compare irrelevant things, why not talk about the 10,000-100,000 that people spend on their cars.

"It won't matter if you just use the cartridges"--Nintendo fans in January

"Oh, ****. DLC is a thing."--Nintendo fans in April

Video broken.

Descriptions?

@doctor_mg: When you say "supports" do you mean there's actually a card out there that hits 312MB/s? Or do you mean that it's possible for cards to hit that number?