Raiko101's forum posts
[QUOTE="Raiko101"]The Playstation/Nintendo 64/Dreamcast era for me. There was far more originality and diverse games around because 3D gaming was so new. Things started becoming repetitive rather than perfected during the PS2/Xbox/GameCube era and now things are just stale.savebatteryDreamcast was part of the Gamecube/PS2/Xbox generation. Saturn was SEGA's 32 bit console.The Saturn was definately part of the era, although not really a highlight. The Dreamcast may have been far more powerful than the others, but it's lifespan was longer before the PS2's release than it was after. That and it was practically dead before the Xbox and GameCube launched. That's why I consider it part of the PS1/N64 era, even if it was a little late.
I don't get how people come to the conclusion that Resident Evil 5 would suffer on the Wii in any form, graphicaly or through gameplay. There are so few moments during the game when the screen is littered with zombies, which would be my first thought. That and the best of these moments is towards the beginning of the game when you are trapped in the house. A scenario mighty similar to that in Resident Evil 4 in which you are defending a 2 floor wooden house surrounded by zombies. Proof enough to me that the Wii is capable of replicating these vary scenarios again. Then you have the Mercenaries mode, which in Resident Evil 5 is no more chaotic than that of Resident Evil 4. Nor does it contain a notable increase in zombies. Gaphically, Resident Evil 4 is a beautiful looking game by any standards and so replicating areas of a similar quality wouldn't be a problem either.
The only other issue that comes to mind is the split-screen gameplay, which would probably have to be excluded, unless playing online. Not that it makes the game that much more enjoyable anyway.
Log in to comment