Every one would have gone for PC and it is noticable that graphics are the best on it and improves fastly. But one big reason people strain from PC is that all games dont come on PC. PC gives 1-2 blockbuster a year as compared to Consoles which at the minmum give 5-6 blockbuster games a year and noticibly at the end of lifecycle of consoles this number increases to twice.

Gears2 easily looks better Gears. A softness is there in Gears2 and every thing is sharp and well light.

The best looking handheld game no doubt. But yeah GOW 2 did looked better.

@Clever_NYC, I hope you have given correct rating, thats good but what you will say to sony fanboys who go on rating any PS2 or PS3 game even mobile suit gundam 10 out of 10 and give 1/10 to any title of any console. I am not saying that you are wrong are anything but just think it once.

Really good articles atleast I can now rest assure that Halo 3 has excellent graphics ( although not the best) and its no way halo2.5 as once stated

No way man! COD is a really good series and one of the best FPS, COD4 features present time story so this would be really awesome.

For me I think 360 is better since it has less stability issue, than on a PC which always needs frequent upgrades to gain stability. Although no one can't deny the fact that if U have the proper hardware PC gives you the best format of the game at lower costs.

Out of the games losted I would only paly NBA homecourt

I dont know abt the 2900 and 8800 comparison but 2400 really looks cool by the hardware it gives on such low price. This card has given me a reason to go for PC gaming again. Its cheap and good enough to play I think all games for next 2 years atleast on a 800*600 resolution.

I really want playstation to get close to 360 then would be good for 360 players and PS 3 players both to have good games with either of the console u choose.