[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Zackariel"]"Subjective" = existent only in the mind. If morality is subjective, it does not physically or temporally exist; it is a figment of imagination that can conceivably be eradicated with the right meds and technology. Example: I interpret the Mona Lisa to be frowning, while someone else interprets it to be smiling. Which of us is right? Neither: because the Mona Lisa is neither smiling nor frowning. We're imagining it. If one of us is right, and the Mona Lisa is smiling/frowning, the interpretation remains subjective but one of us is simply wrong in our interpretations, because one interpretation is rooted in reality while the other is not.

There's more to this analogy, but this is pertinent to the discussion.

Zackariel

Cop-out if I've ever seen one. Morality is the Mona Lisa: there are interpretations but I contend that some interpretations are wrong because they are not rooted in reality.

[QUOTE="Red-XIII"]Uwe Boll! Uwe Boll! I wanna see him do it! :lol:Film-Guy

I actually didnt hate his last film Postal.

It's likely that the flagellum was once a separate organism that chose to co-exist with another organism. Hence the double membrane (the outer membrane from the host, the inner from the flagellum). The same applies to other cellular organs like mitochondria. This also explains why those organs have retained some of their own genetic material (separate from the cellular core).

Complexity was not born in one day: it's the result of millions of years of evolution.

Let's do the time warp again!

I thought it was 2009, not 2008...

Proof right here that Christians "pick and choose" what parts of the Bible they follow:

If you're going to use Leviticus to condemn homosexuals, but don't follow these laws, kindly shut up.

James 2:10
" For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it."

[QUOTE="Red-XIII"][QUOTE="Thessassin"]seriously guys stop ganging up on mind mover, what he says actually makes sense, life cant start from nothing and you dont have to believe all the parts of evolution. he dosent put his paith in the origins of evolution and whats wrong with that?Mind_Mover